Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 154
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
 Table of Contents  
REVIEW ARTICLE: REPUBLICATION
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 3  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 39-43

Vascular injury during spinal surgery


1 Department of Surgery, The Reading Hospital and Medical Center, PA, USA
2 OPUS 12 Foundation, King of Prussia, PA, USA

Date of Web Publication21-Apr-2017

Correspondence Address:
Stanislaw P Stawicki
St. Luke's University Health Network, EW2 Research Administration, 801 Ostrum Street, Bethlehem, PA 18015
USA
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/IJAM.IJAM_97_16

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Key points: (a) Iatrogenic vascular injury is a rare but well recognized complication of spinal surgery; (b) The most serious injuries involve the aorta and its major branches; (c) Vascular injuries following spinal surgery can present early or late; (d) Early presentation usually involves intraoperative hemorrhage and may be associated with hemodynamic instability; (e) Injuries that present late include pseudoaneurysms and arteriovenous fistulae; (f) Arteriography– traditional, CT or MRI angiography– should be used to diagnose the injury and define relevant vascular anatomy; (g) Therapy may require surgery or interventional techniques.
The following core competencies are addressed in this article: Medical knowledge, Patient care.
Republished with permission from: Reilly EF, Weger NS, Stawicki SP. Vascular injury during spinal surgery. OPUS 12 Scientist 2008;2(2):7-10.

Keywords: Diagnosis and treatment, review, spinal surgery, vascular injury


How to cite this article:
Reilly EF, Weger NS, Stawicki SP. Vascular injury during spinal surgery. Int J Acad Med 2017;3, Suppl S1:39-43

How to cite this URL:
Reilly EF, Weger NS, Stawicki SP. Vascular injury during spinal surgery. Int J Acad Med [serial online] 2017 [cited 2017 Oct 23];3, Suppl S1:39-43. Available from: http://www.ijam-web.org/text.asp?2017/3/3/39/204978




  Introduction Top


Iatrogenic vascular injury is a rare but well-recognized complication of the spinal surgical procedures. Injury to the aorta and its major branches has been reported, following cervical, thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spinal instrumentation procedures.[1],[2],[3],[4],[5],[6],[7]

Vascular injuries resulting from instrumentation during spinal surgery can be divided into early and late types. Early injuries occur intraoperatively or shortly after surgery and usually involve bleeding that requires immediate intervention.[2] Late injuries may present days, months, or even years after the index operation.[8] Pseudoaneurysms and arteriovenous fistulae constitute most of the lesions in this group.[9],[10],[11]

Whenever major vascular injury is suspected, clinical considerations should begin with the assurance of adequate vascular control and hemodynamic stability. It is important to remember that mortality associated with vessel rupture can be as high as 80% and mortality associated with vascular injury without vessel rupture can reach 10%.[1],[3],[4],[5],[9],[10],[12],[13],[14],[15]

In the setting of suspected vascular injury, traditional angiography, computed tomographic (CT) angiography, or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) angiography may be employed to confirm the diagnosis and help plan interventional and/or operative vascular repair.[6],[11],[16],[17] The choice of diagnostic imaging should be based on the overall index of clinical suspicion and patient stability. It is important to obtain follow-up imaging after endovascular intervention or operative repair of vascular injuries in order to document adequacy of the repair or any signs of postprocedural failure. An overview of vascular lesions based on the anatomic region (cervical, thoracic, lumbar, and sacral) will now follow.


  Cervical Spine Top


Iatrogenic injury to the carotid artery by a transarticular screw is a rare but very serious complication of surgery on the cervical spine. Although bleeding and pseudoaneurysm formation may be the most common clinical manifestations, there are also reports of delayed clinical presentation characterized by repetitive cerebral infarctions, following unrecognized operative carotid injury.[2],[10],[12],[18]

Pseudoaneurysms and other injuries of the vertebral arteries have been reported following cervical spinal fusion, with an incidence of approximately 0.5%. In a study by Kast et al.,[12] transpedicular screw fixation in the cervical spine was associated with 21% incidence of screw misplacement and >25% narrowing of the vertebral canal in 4 of 16 cases. Although no vascular injury was seen in that study, the potential for one clearly existed. In the same study, the only statistically significant risk factor for screw misplacement was the surgical level, with all “critical” breaches seen from C3 to C5.[2],[10],[12],[18]

Traditional arteriography or CT/MRI angiography should be obtained whenever vascular injury following surgery on the cervical spine is suspected. Ultrasonographic techniques may also be helpful in this setting. Treatment may involve operative repair or endovascular intervention in selected cases. Endovascular techniques (i.e., stenting, embolization, coil occlusion) have been used in cases of both carotid and vertebral arterial injuries. Follow-up angiography is important after repair of any vascular injuries regardless of whether operative or interventional treatment was undertaken.[2],[7],[10],[12],[18]


  Thoracic Spine Top


Despite the potentially high morbidity, few reports of iatrogenic vascular injury associated with thoracic spine procedures exist in literature. Proper placement of thoracic spinal pedicle screws can be technically challenging even to experienced spinal surgeons. The proximity of the aorta to the thoracic spine may contribute to potentially life-threatening complications during screw placement. Anatomic anomalies, such as scoliosis, can further increase this risk. Surgery may be required to correct screw placement and repair any associated aortic injury.[8],[14],[17]

In one study of thoracic pedicle screw placement in human cadavers by experienced spinal surgeons, 37 of 90 screws penetrated the pedicle cortex and 16 of those penetrated the lateral cortex. The frequency of screw misplacement in live patients has been reported to be between 4% and 25%. The aorta is at most risk during screw placement in the fifth through twelfth thoracic vertebrae. Abutment of the screw tip against the aorta has been reported to occur in 2%–12% of cases and the complete natural history of such abutment is not known. The position of the aorta relative to the thoracic spine in scoliosis may increase the risk during pedicle screw placement in this group of patients.[7],[8],[14],[17]

Aortic injury can manifest in an acute or delayed fashion. Hemodynamic instability may occur in acute aortic perforation and is usually associated with brisk bleeding. Acute ruptures may occur during surgery but have been reported up to 5 months postoperatively. Aortic pseudoaneurysms are typically a late finding occurring anywhere between 11 months and 20 years postoperatively and may become infected. Delayed rupture of a calcified descending thoracic aorta at the site of intraoperative retraction has also been reported.[7],[8],[14],[17]

Treatment of aortic injury following pedicle screw placement has been described using a variety of techniques. Both the vascular injury and screw malposition must be evaluated and addressed. Good outcomes have been reported for vascular injury repair using endovascular graft, patch angioplasty, and open tube graft.[7],[8],[14],[17] Screw malposition can be rectified by screw repositioning or removal [Figure 1] and [Figure 2].
Figure 1: Example of a fixation screw in direct contact with the thoracic aorta. The screw was subsequently re-adjusted as shown in Figure 2

Click here to view
Figure 2: Axial images of fixation screw before (left) and after (right) prompt repositioning. Computed tomographic aortogram (right) shows no injury to the aorta

Click here to view



  Lumbar Spine Top


Surgical instrumentation of the lumbar spine has been associated with a variety of vascular injuries and potentially devastating sequelae of such injuries.[1] The reported incidence of vascular injury in this setting varies from 0.05% to 4%.[1],[3],[4],[5],[6] The high mortality rate (up to 40%) is attributed to a combination of rapid blood loss and the failure to promptly recognize the cause of the patient's clinical deterioration.[1],[3],[4],[5],[6] Early diagnosis and treatment are essential. Treatment has traditionally consisted of open vascular surgical repair. However, the evolution of modern imaging and endovascular techniques now allows the clinicians to utilize minimally invasive endovascular treatment as the first-line therapy in patients who are hemodynamically stable.

Venous injury is considerably more common than arterial injury in the lumbar anatomic region, with reported incidence between 5% and 15% after procedures on the lumbar spine.[19] Most venous injuries occur at the L5/S1 surgical level. They can be usually repaired by direct suture repair and rarely result in any appreciable short- or long-term sequelae.[1],[3],[4],[6],[13],[15],[16],[19],[20]

In a study by Szolar et al.,[16] intraoperative vascular complications included lacerations of the abdominal aorta and median sacral artery. One case of an arteriovenous fistula between the left common iliac artery and vein was detected 19 days, following discectomy. In another case, a partially thrombosed aortic aneurysm with an arteriovenous fistula between the aneurysm and the inferior vena cava was found 11 months after spinal surgery.[16]

Anterior exposure of the lower lumbar spine (L4-S1) requires mobilization of the left common iliac vessels as they course obliquely across the anterior portion of the L5 vertebral body and portions of the L4-L5 and L5-S1 disc spaces. The left common iliac vein, because of its dorsal location, is the most likely vascular structure to be injured during anterior lumbar spinal surgery.[1],[3],[13],[19],[20] Iliac artery injury with arterial occlusion and/or thrombosis can occur as well and may require thrombectomy, arterial repair, and/or arterial bypass procedure. Rhabdomyolysis associated with significant morbidity and even mortality has been reported in this setting if the injury is not recognized promptly.[13]

A study by Fantini et al.[6] identified risk factors for vascular injury during anterior spinal surgery. Active or previous osteomyelitis, discogenic infection, osteophyte formation, previous anterior spinal surgery, transitional lumbosacral vertebra, and anterior migration of interbody device seem to be associated with increased risk of vascular injury during anterior spinal surgery. Careful intraoperative handling of the vascular structures and liberal use of hemostatic agents may be helpful in hemorrhage control and preservation of vascular patency. Postoperative surveillance for proximal deep venous thrombosis should be performed after venorrhaphy – traditional, CT, or magnetic resonance venography – may be performed. Ultrasonography may also be considered in this setting.[5],[19],[21]

Arteriovenous fistulae constitute some of the more commonly reported vascular injuries, following lumbar spine surgery.[9],[11] Large arteriovenous fistulae usually present with some evidence of congestive heart failure (left ventricular hypertrophy, left ventricular diastolic overload, pulmonary hypertension, dyspnea) and characteristic bruit on auscultation. Clinical signs and symptoms associated with large arteriovenous fistulae tend to resolve following definitive repair of these lesions.

While open surgical exploration and repair continue to be the definitive treatment of vascular injuries detected intraoperatively and accompanied by hemodynamic instability, significant advances in endovascular techniques are changing the treatment of vascular injuries associated with lumbar spinal procedures in hemodynamically stable patients.[8],[11],[22] Endovascular stenting with or without coil embolization has been highly successful for delayed vascular lesions – arteriovenous fistulae and pseudoaneurysms.[8],[11] Emergent endovascular coil occlusion of actively bleeding vessels is now possible in the setting of early postoperative hemodynamic instability.[8],[11],[22]


  Sacral Region Top


There is a significant risk of injury to neurovascular structures during placement of sacral screws. In a cadaveric study by Ergur et al.,[5] 17% of sacral screws were in direct contact with the middle sacral artery and 10% were in direct contact or proximity with the middle sacral vein. In addition, the authors identified cases where the lateral sacral vein was “disrupted” by the screws. The diagnostic and treatment approach to vascular injuries resulting from procedures performed on the sacral spine is similar to that for other spinal regions. The choice of procedural intervention should be guided mainly by the presence of bleeding and patient physiology.


  Conclusions Top


Iatrogenic vascular injury is a rare but well-recognized complication of spinal surgical procedures. Injuries resulting from instrumentation during spinal surgery can be divided into early and late subtypes. Early injuries manifest either intraoperatively or shortly after surgery, and generally involve “surgical” bleeding. Late injuries may present days, months, or even years later. Pseudoaneurysms and arteriovenous fistulae are most common in this group. In the setting of suspected vascular injury, traditional angiography, CT angiography, or MRI angiography may be employed to confirm the diagnosis and help plan interventional and/or operative vascular repair. It is important to ensure follow-up imaging after endovascular intervention or operative repair to document adequacy of the repair or any signs of postprocedural failure. The risk of both arterial and venous injuries should be clearly communicated with the patient as a part of the preoperative consent process.

Acknowledgement

Justifications for re-publishing this scholarly content include: (a) The phasing out of the original publication after a formal merger of OPUS 12 Scientist with the International Journal of Academic Medicine and (b) Wider dissemination of the research outcome(s) and the associated scientific knowledge.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Baker JK, Reardon PR, Reardon MJ, Heggeness MH. Vascular injury in anterior lumbar surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1993;18:2227-30.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Bogaerde MV, Viaene P, Thijs V. Iatrogenic perforation of the internal carotid artery by a transarticular screw: An unusual case of repetitive ischemic stroke. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2007;109:466-9.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Brau SA, Delamarter RB, Schiffman ML, Williams LA, Watkins RG. Vascular injury during anterior lumbar surgery. Spine J 2004;4:409-12.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Dösoglu M, Is M, Pehlivan M, Yildiz KH. Nightmare of lumbar disc surgery: Iliac artery injury. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2006;108:174-7.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Ergur I, Akcali O, Kiray A, Kosay C, Tayefi H. Neurovascular risks of sacral screws with bicortical purchase: An anatomical study. Eur Spine J 2007;16:1519-23.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Fantini GA, Pappou IP, Girardi FP, Sandhu HS, Cammisa FP Jr. Major vascular injury during anterior lumbar spinal surgery: Incidence, risk factors, and management. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007;32:2751-8.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Inamasu J, Guiot BH. Vascular injury and complication in neurosurgical spine surgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2006;148:375-87.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Kakkos SK, Shepard AD. Delayed presentation of aortic injury by pedicle screws: Report of two cases and review of the literature. J Vasc Surg 2008;47:1074-82.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Machado-Atías I, Fornés O, González-Bello R, Machado-Hernández I. Iliac arteriovenous fistula due to spinal disk surgery. Causes severe hemodynamic repercussion with pulmonary hypertension. Tex Heart Inst J 1993;20:60-4.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Méndez JC, González-Llanos F. Endovascular treatment of a vertebral artery pseudoaneurysm following posterior C1-C2 transarticular screw fixation. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2005;28:107-9.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Ventura M, Rivellini C, Saracino G, Mastromarino A, Spartera C, Zannetti S. Endovascular treatment of a postlaminectomy arteriovenous fistula. A case report. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2002;43:523-6.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Kast E, Mohr K, Richter HP, Börm W. Complications of transpedicular screw fixation in the cervical spine. Eur Spine J 2006;15:327-34.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Kulkarni SS, Lowery GL, Ross RE, Ravi Sankar K, Lykomitros V. Arterial complications following anterior lumbar interbody fusion: Report of eight cases. Eur Spine J 2003;12:48-54.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Oskouian RJ Jr., Johnson JP. Vascular complications in anterior thoracolumbar spinal reconstruction. J Neurosurg 2002;96 1 Suppl:1-5.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Raskas DS, Delamarter RB. Occlusion of the left iliac artery after retroperitoneal exposure of the spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1997;338:86-9.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Szolar DH, Preidler KW, Steiner H, Riepl T, Flaschka G, Stiskal M, et al. Vascular complications in lumbar disk surgery: Report of four cases. Neuroradiology 1996;38:521-5.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Vaccaro AR, Rizzolo SJ, Balderston RA, Allardyce TJ, Garfin SR, Dolinskas C, et al. Placement of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine. Part II: An anatomical and radiographic assessment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995;77:1200-6.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Kotani Y, Abumi K, Ito M, Minami A. Improved Accuracy of Computer Assisted Cervical Pedicle Screw Insertion. Available from: http://www.eprints.lib.hokudai.ac.jp/dspace/handle/2115/14767. [Last accessed on 2008 Apr 07].  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Staehli LM, Zehnder T, Schwarzenbach O, Mouton KT, Wagner HE, Mouton WG. Venous injury in lumbar anterior spine surgery. Swiss Med Wkly 2006;136:670-1.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Skippage P, Raja J, McFarland R, Belli AM. Endovascular repair of iliac artery injury complicating lumbar disc surgery. Eur Spine J 2008;17 Suppl 2:S228-31.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Stawicki SP, Hoey BA. Lower extremity arterial thrombosis following sonographically guided thrombin injection of a femoral pseudoaneurysm. J Clin Ultrasound 2007;35:88-93.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Weger N, Stawicki SP, Roll G, Hoddinott KM, Lukaszczyk JJ. Bilateral renal vein thrombosis secondary to membraneous glomerulonephritis: Successful treatment with thrombolytic therapy. Ann Vasc Surg 2006;20:411-4.  Back to cited text no. 22
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Cervical Spine
Thoracic Spine
Lumbar Spine
Sacral Region
Conclusions
References
Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed249    
    Printed15    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded0    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]