Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 326
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 2  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 179-186

Laparoscopic colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis using endostaplers: Surgical technique description


1 Department of Surgery, St. Luke's University Health Network, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, USA
2 Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

Correspondence Address:
Anthony Dippolito
Department of Surgery, St. Luke's University Health Network, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015
USA
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2455-5568.196878

Rights and Permissions

Background and Objectives: Published evidence suggests that colorectal laparoscopic surgery is similar to conventional open surgery in terms of oncological safety. Here, we describe our experience performing a laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with an intracorporeal anastomosis using endostaplers (LRH-IAE). Methods: A retrospective review of patients who underwent LRH-IAE from February 2008 to May 2012 was performed. Demographic, intraoperative, and postoperative data were collected. Key end-points included open conversion rates, adequacy of oncologic resection, and 30-day morbidity and mortality. Results: A total of 27 LRH-IAE procedures were performed during the study period. Median patient age was 74 years, with 12 females and 15 males. Most common indications for surgery included colonic mass (74.1%, n = 20) and incomplete polypectomy (14.8%, n = 4). The median American Society of Anesthesiologists score was 3 (interquartile range [IQR]: 2–3) and median operative time was 312 min (IQR: 200–420 min). There were no conversions to open laparotomy. Surgical margins were negative in all patients, with a median of 17 lymph nodes examined per specimen. Nine patients experienced postoperative morbidity, including cardiac (7.4%, n = 2), pulmonary (18.5%, n = 5), and abdominal (22.2%, n = 6) complications. Abdominal complications included ileus (3.7%, n = 1), perforated viscus/leak (7.4%, n = 2), anastomotic stricture (3.8%, n = 1), and an incisional hernia (7.4%, n = 2). All-cause 30-day mortality was 11.1% (3/27). The median length of stay was 5 days (range: 3–42 days). Conclusion: This report shows that LRH-IAE in high-risk surgical population is characterized by an acceptable risk-benefit profile. LRH-IAE offers the advantages of less tissue manipulation and adheres to established oncological principles. The following core competencies are addressed in this article: Medical knowledge and patient care.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2511    
    Printed74    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded21    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal