International Journal of Academic Medicine

EDITORIAL
Year
: 2020  |  Volume : 6  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 163--178

What's new in Academic International Medicine? International health security agenda – Expanded and re-defined


Nicole K Le1, Manish Garg2, Ricardo Izurieta1, Sona M Garg3, Thomas J Papadimos4, Bonnie Arquilla5, Andrew C Miller6, Abbas M Khan6, Tamara Worlton7, Michael S Firstenberg8, Sagar C Galwankar9, Sunil Raina9, Harry L Anderson III10, Rebecca Jeanmonod11, Kristiana Kaufmann12, Donald Jeanmonod11, Annelies De Wulf13, Dianne McCallister14, Christina Bloem5, Ijeoma Nnodim Opara12, Niels D Martin15, Juan A Asensio16, Stanislaw P Stawicki11,  
1 University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
2 New York Presbyterian Weill Cornell Medicine and Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
3 Elitra Health, New York, NY, USA
4 The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
5 SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA
6 Nazareth Hospital - Trinity Health Mid-Atlantic, Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
7 Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
8 The Medical Center of Aurora, Aurora CO, USA
9 Florida State University, Sarasota, FL, USA
10 St. Joseph Mercy Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
11 St. Luke's Univeristy Health Network, Bethlehem, PA, USA
12 Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA
13 Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA
14 Porter Adventist Hospital, Denver, CO, USA
15 University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
16 Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Stanislaw P Stawicki
St. Luke's Univeristy Health Network, Bethlehem, PA
USA




How to cite this article:
Le NK, Garg M, Izurieta R, Garg SM, Papadimos TJ, Arquilla B, Miller AC, Khan AM, Worlton T, Firstenberg MS, Galwankar SC, Raina S, Anderson III HL, Jeanmonod R, Kaufmann K, Jeanmonod D, De Wulf A, McCallister D, Bloem C, Opara IN, Martin ND, Asensio JA, Stawicki SP. What's new in Academic International Medicine? International health security agenda – Expanded and re-defined.Int J Acad Med 2020;6:163-178


How to cite this URL:
Le NK, Garg M, Izurieta R, Garg SM, Papadimos TJ, Arquilla B, Miller AC, Khan AM, Worlton T, Firstenberg MS, Galwankar SC, Raina S, Anderson III HL, Jeanmonod R, Kaufmann K, Jeanmonod D, De Wulf A, McCallister D, Bloem C, Opara IN, Martin ND, Asensio JA, Stawicki SP. What's new in Academic International Medicine? International health security agenda – Expanded and re-defined. Int J Acad Med [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Nov 29 ];6:163-178
Available from: https://www.ijam-web.org/text.asp?2020/6/3/163/296137


Full Text



 Introduction



International health security (IHS) encompasses any natural or anthropogenic occurrence that can threaten the safety of human health and well-being. The American College of Academic International Medicine Consensus Group (ACAIM-CG) developed and recently published a summative assessment highlighting an expanded and re-defined global IHS agenda.[1] The broadened scope of IHS now includes a variety of topics including emerging infectious diseases (EIDs), chronic health conditions (CHCs), social determinants of health (SDH, including access to care), civilian injury and interpersonal violence (CIV), terrorism (inclusive of bioterrorism), planetary changes (volcanic eruptions, earthquakes, wildfires, and climate change), nuclear incidents (both civilian and military), information and cyber-health security (CHS), industrialization and related dangers, globalization, public infrastructure, pharmaceutical production and supply chains, misuse of communication platforms (e.g., social media [SM]), as well as systemic racism and other forms of discrimination. These concerns can directly and indirectly impact IHS both in the short and long term. When considering IHS, our group's primary goal is to emphasize the utility of applying a predefined framework to effectively approach health security threats. This framework comprises a perpetually repeating cycle of prevention, detection, assessment, reporting, response, and addressing needs, with appropriate mitigation efforts built-in and hardwired into the collective health security response. This document provides an outline of the recently published summative assessment in this important area of international academic medicine, as well as our recommendations, regarding appropriate system-wide improvement strategies.

 Background



IHS, also referred to as “global health (GH) security” or “public health security,” consists of topics that pertain to well-being of humankind and broadly understood “safety from harm.”[2],[3] Due to the existing overlap between “health” and “security” and the variability in its interpretation, the primary domain can be defined much more broadly when one considers the potential impact of various human-made and nonhuman-made events or factors on “health security” from the GH governance perspective.[4],[5],[6],[7] Within the latter subset, a number of important topics emerge [Table 1].[8],[9],[10] This Executive Summary provides an overview of issues that have the potential to directly or indirectly impact IHS. It was prepared specifically to reflect and highlight the perspective of Academic International Medicine (AIM) as previously defined by the American College of Academic International Medicine (ACAIM).[11]{Table 1}

 International Health Security: the Mechanism for Sustainable Development



As outlined in our summative assessment, the ACAIM-CG advocates for the universal adoption of a continuous IHS assessment cycle [Figure 1]. Such cycle, combined with appropriate mitigation measures hardwired into the overall global IHS response framework, should serve to ensure that ongoing evaluation and process improvement become the prevailing approaches to address the current and future health security crises. Details of the mechanism for sustainable development are provided in our summative assessment document.[1] We will now outline each of the topics listed in [Table 1], providing a foundation for future discourse on the expanded and re-defined construct of IHS.{Figure 1}

Access to care

Within the complex and highly intertwined realm of IHS, it is critical to consider lack of adequate access to healthcare as a significant public health security threat.[12],[13] The current novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, as well as the 2014–2015 Ebola outbreak, both demonstrate the critical nature of the continued access to care and its role in ensuring health system proficiency across other, closely related domains (e.g., CHCs, SDH, and food security).[14],[15],[16],[17] Furthermore, the importance of access to care to IHS can be readily appreciated when examining the current human migrations and refugee crises.[14],[18],[19],[20] The lack of access to healthcare has been highlighted by the COVID-19 pandemic, but the problem is by no means new and has traditionally been most pronounced in the day-to-day medical disparities like cancer screening and access to advanced therapies. The ACAIM-CG recommends that comprehensive policies be developed at local, regional, national, and international levels to incorporate access to care as an urgent IHS threat.

Biological, chemical, and conventional warfare

War and conflict, especially as it relates to civilian casualties, has been compared to a legalized form of killing.[21] However, the effects of warfare, whether biological, chemical, or conventional in nature, go well beyond the death and physical destruction. More specifically, damage to critical healthcare infrastructure or disruption of pharmaceutical supply chains may result in excess mortality among the affected population(s).[22],[23] In addition, opportunistic infectious diseases may re-emerge during armed conflicts, due to poor sanitary conditions, economic sanctions, or absence of functioning public health infrastructure.[24] Our group believes that the capacity to produce weapons, especially those of biological or chemical type, should be curtailed via global consensus mechanisms.[25] In addition, the introduction of nanotechnology should be closely monitored and regulated in the context of chemical or biological weaponization and delivery platform development.[26] The ACAIM-CG also condemns any armed conflict or military aggression where political or other alternative solution may be feasible, with primary prevention as the cornerstone of our recommended approach.

Chronic health conditions, inclusive of mental health concerns

The increasing prevalence of CHCs, from diabetes to depression, has become an urgent public health issue.[27],[28],[29] This is especially true in the context of access to care in low-and-middle-income regions (LMIRs). The world population ≥60 years of age is expected to triple from 962 million in 2017 to 3.1 billion in the year 2100, and in the context of CHCs, this must be viewed as an IHS threat. Dementia, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, obesity, mental health disorders, human immunodeficiency virus, sexually transmitted diseases, malnutrition, substance abuse, and polypharmacy are among key challenges, with LMIRs affected the most.[30],[31],[32],[33] Strategies aiming to achieve long-term sustainability in the area of CHC management should include focus on innovation, technological advances, and capacity building via global economies of scale.[28],[34] As access to care in many countries is suboptimal, home health and telemedicine are positioned to replace less efficient models.[35],[36],[37] Improved preventative programs for diabetes and cardiovascular screening may be accelerated with point-of-care technology. The aging populations can also benefit from patient-centered care. Finally, early discussions of end-of-life (EOL) care can help reconcile patient and community goals.[38] Home hospice, ethical EOL policy measures, and better community education can significantly improve patient and family experiences.[39]

Civilian injury and interpersonal violence

In addition to the tremendous societal cost of traumatic injury, in general,[40] the impact of civilian injury and interpersional violence (CIV) – ranging from criminal activity to large-scale rioting – on IHS cannot be over-emphasized. The relationship between CIV and IHS is complex, multi-factorial, and confounded by multiple factors and competing priorities. Concerns regarding CIV go well beyond the actual acts of violence, extending into the systemic response to such acts. While a full review of the impact of one on the other exceeds the scope of this work, there are clearly urgent issues that must be acknowledged and considered in the current context.

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, many communities instituted strict isolation, or “stay at home” orders, with unprecedented travel restrictions and quarantine regulations.[17],[41] The inability of individuals to remove themselves, even if temporarily, from hostile or unsafe living conditions has prompted concerns of increased cases and severity of domestic abuse and other forms of interpersonal violence.[17],[42] In parallel, especially in the United States, the increase in gun violence and mass-shooting events has not only prompted calls for stricter gun control laws but was also paradoxically associated with substantial increases in sales of firearms. Similarly, increased gun sales are seen during the COVID-19 pandemic and have prompted further concerns, regarding the relationships between the increased number of guns and CIV – especially in the context of the complex socioeconomic picture of an evolving pandemic.[42],[43],[44]

During the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, growing political polarization and worsening socioeconomic inequity led to significant increases in social justice demonstrations and in some cases culminated in episodes of rapidly escalating violence. The occurrence of rioting, looting, and shootings and the systemic response to such events can lead to significant disruptions across over-burdened public services, including the healthcare system. In addition, such events can have a substantial impact on the trust required between the citizenry and healthcare leadership to achieve mutual goals, leading to concerns regarding both the access to care and health outcomes.[17],[45]

Furthermore, there must be a greater recognition and awareness regarding the long-term consequences of social unrest and civilian acts of violence. The costs in terms of lost productivity, direct and indirect healthcare costs (especially in populations with limited access to health insurance), and life-long disability are substantial and likely under-appreciated. In the current era of over-burdened healthcare systems, limited financial resources, and the presence of multiple competing priorities, the impact of CIV on IHS becomes clear.[46],[47],[48] Finally, moving beyond the long-term medical costs of injury-related physical disabilities, we must recognize the tremendous impact of short- and long-term mental health implications due to civilian violence on societal well-being. This includes deep and very much under-appreciated psychological trauma among children who witness or experience various forms of interpersonal violence.[49],[50]

Emerging infectious diseases

The emergence (and re-emergence) of pathogens represents a significant threat to public health, regardless of resource availability.[51],[52],[53],[54],[55] This is clearly demonstrated by the current COVID-19 pandemic.[17] Detection of new IHS threats in this domain is challenging, especially in terms of economic strain and healthcare system capacity.[17],[53],[54],[56],[57],[58],[59],[60] As with other IHS subdomains, EIDs often affect many other areas related to health security, from critical healthcare infrastructure to the economic implications of nonpharmacological interventions, such as social distancing, travel restrictions, or “shelter-in-place” orders.[41]

The ACAIM action plan to prevent the emergence or re-emergence of infectious disease outbreaks includes, but is not limited to, active surveillance for (and timely response to) outbreaks, education and dissemination of key information to all stakeholders, antibiotic stewardship, vector control, and global standardization of management approaches.[54] In a world characterized by continual globalization, ongoing human migrations and increasing ease of travel take on extreme importance to IHS in the context of EIDs.[61],[62] Collectively, the above subcomponents of the expanded IHS framework may contribute to accelerated disease transmission, and when coupled with inadequate response, lack of recognition, and limited awareness of various associated risks, local outbreaks can easily escalate into pandemics.[53],[63],[64],[65]

Food and agricultural security

Broadly speaking, the term “food security” pertains to both the immediate access to food and the ability of existing means of agricultural production and supply chains to ensure sustainable levels of food availability.[65],[66] This subdomain of IHS, much like the other components listed in [Table 1], is deeply embedded within the complex and multi-factorial “health security” matrix. For example, the presence of an EID outbreak, ongoing conflict, or a refugee crisis all affect the fragile balance required to ensure food and agricultural security (FAS) within a region, a country, or at the international level.[67],[68],[69] Moreover, the subdomain of planetary change incorporates a number of threats to agricultural security, including the appearance of invasive species that threaten local food production.[70],[71],[72] Given the critical importance of the issue of FAS, the ACAIM-CG proposes a coordinated global approach, using the proposed IHS action framework [Figure 1] to address this important problem.

Globalization of travel and trade

Modern human activity has had a tremendous impact on both individual and population health and well-being.[73] Key etiological and inherently interrelated concepts include industrialization, globalization of travel and trade, information transfers, and social interactions. Globalization and increased human mobility have greatly augmented the risk of vector-borne disease transmission, especially in the context of planetary climate change (PCC).[74],[75] Moreover, increasing human interconnectedness, while having a positive effect on intercultural relatability and collaboration, has at that same time facilitated the globalization of violence through terrorism, SM, and political destabilization.[76],[77],[78]

Health informatics and cyber-health security

Healthcare institutions are facing increasing CHS threats.[79],[80] Still, the academic healthcare community has been relatively slow to recognize and mitigate concerns related to cyber security.[81] Within this broad area of IHS, three subdomains have been identified: (a) Software supply chain attacks where malignant actors infiltrate the information technology infrastructure via a third-party vendor (e.g., Electronic Health Record add-ons) or partner (e.g., heating, ventilation and air conditioning) systems.[82],[83],[84] Of concern, recent report notes a 200% increase in supply chain attacks across all industry sectors;[84] (b) Internet of things attacks where malignant actors exploit nontraditional devices that are connected to the internet to gain access to sensitive information and critical healthcare/infrastructure systems;[85],[86],[87] and (c) Ransomware attacks where criminals use malicious software to infiltrate computer systems or connected devices in order to encrypt a user's files,[88] often using highly sophisticated and deceptive methods.[89] Once encrypted, the information is indecipherable and inaccessible, requiring a ransom payment to “unlock” it for further access. The ACAIM-CG recommends strict adherence to existing laws, regulations, and standards pertaining to the improvement of CHS.[90] A 2013 U.S. Presidential Executive Order defines, “critical infrastructure” as “systems and assets, whether physical or virtual, so vital…that the incapacity or destruction of such systems and assets would have a debilitating impact on security, national economic security, national public health or safety, or any combination of those matters.”[90] Although further discussion on this important topic is beyond the scope of this Executive Summary, the reader is referred to additional sources for more information.[91],[92],[93],[94],[95],[96],[97],[98]

Industrialization and related topics

Industrial activity increasingly impacts the finely balanced planetary ecological and biophysical system.[99] The World Health Organization (WHO) 2006 Report on the estimate of the environmental contribution to disease mentions that about one quarter of the global disease burden and more than one-third of the burden of disease among children can be attributed to planetary changes. Earth's environmental disequilibrium has been evidenced in the contamination of freshwater bodies, atmospheric pollution, decrease in biodiversity, and other related phenomena.[100],[101],[102] In addition to workplace injury and industrial accidents,[103],[104] industrialization is a key contributor to the contemporary health epidemics of obesity and cardiovascular disease – a long-term trend rooted in the human transition from agricultural to service activities.[105],[106],[107] Industrialization has led to increased energy demands, dependence on fossil fuels, and resultant contribution to global climate change.[108],[109] Additional planetary-level effects include extreme weather events, dangerous and unpredictable heat (and cold) waves, decreased crop yields and nutritional density, as well as emerging new patterns of vector-borne diseases.[53],[110],[111],[112],[113],[114] Extreme weather events lead to greater devastation and property destruction, exacerbating hardships faced by LMIRs, leading to downstream sequelae (e.g., mass hunger, migrations, and armed conflict).[112],[113],[115],[116] Due to the complexity of the topic and its interconnectedness with other IHS domains, the ACAIM-GC recommends a holistic approach to sustainable industrialization and related areas.

Natural disasters

Destructive forces of nature, whether related to atmospheric, tectonic, or volcanic events, have the potential to deeply impact the fragile IHS balance.[115],[117],[118] Volcanic eruptions and associated earthquakes pose significant health security risk and inherently affect human activity and health as more than 500 million people live in proximity to volcanoes.[119],[120] Between 1900 and 2009, nearly 5 million people were affected by volcanic events, with approximately 100,000 deaths caused by ash asphyxiation, thermal injuries from pyroclastic flow, and trauma.[119],[121] Volcanic ash exposure can lead to pulmonary complications (e.g., acute respiratory distress, suffocation, chronic lung disease), ocular injuries/infections, and cutaneous reactions.[122],[123],[124],[125],[126],[127] At higher elevations, ice melting can lead to flooding and mud slides. Moreover, volcanoes can emit harmful gases which include carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, hydrogen fluoride, and CO2/H2S (carbon dioxide [CO2], and hydrogen sulfide). These gases accumulate in low areas, may be colorless and odorless, and are easily inhaled leading to a variety of respiratory complaints.[128] Volcanic ash-containing crystalline silica can lead to chronic lung disease. Volcano-associated earthquakes may cause structural damage and displacement.[128] Finally, there may be significant mental health sequelae (e.g., posttraumatic stress disorder [PTSD] and anxiety).[122],[123],[124],[125],[126],[127] Volcanic events may lead to significant socioeconomic disruptions by negatively affecting crops, livestock, water supply, and heavy metal concentrations in the soil, causing a number of direct and indirect effects including property destruction, impaired access to healthcare, and transportation freezes.[128],[129] For example, the largest air transportation halt since the World War II (WWII) occurred during the 2010 Icelandic Eyjafjallajökull eruption, where an estimated 107,000 flights were cancelled during an 8-day period.[130],[131],[132] The event affected nearly half of the global air traffic, including 10.5 million stranded passengers and a staggering cost of over $1.7 billion.[131],[132] Volcanic event readiness requires a comprehensive approach which involves preparation, an emergency action plan, and a postdisaster response framework.[128],[133],[134],[135],[136],[137] Of importance, appropriate mitigation procedures should also be considered in case primary plans/procedures fail. Postdisaster assistance and restoration will require internal and external cooperative efforts, and community involvement is critical. Teaching local community members how to treat/temporize burns, administer inhalers, provide oxygen, and give oral fluids for dehydration can greatly assist local health centers.

Earthquakes can present a significant IHS threat, especially when present in LMIRs, when major damage to healthcare infrastructure is sustained in a relatively geographically isolated setting, or when other exacerbating factors complicate the ensuing relief effort.[117],[138],[139],[140] In the case of the 2010 Haiti earthquake, the confluence of factors from across various IHS subdomains (including poor public health infrastructure and an ensuing cholera outbreak) resulted in a series of events that led to observed mortality and morbidity figures well above those originally projected.[141],[142],[143]

Wind disasters (e.g., hurricanes) represent another important entity in IHS and once again tend to disproportionately affect low-resource areas of the globe.[115],[144] In addition to significant loss of life, major property damage can occur, with healthcare infrastructure being far from immune under such scenarios.[115] Similar to earthquakes, wind disasters have been associated with excess mortality attributable to a confluence of various individual IHS threats co-occurring simultaneously within a short period of time.[145]

Finally, increases in severity and frequency of natural fires have been noted across the globe,[146],[147],[148],[149],[150] including the Amazon rainforest fires in Brazil that prompted great concern among climate scientists.[151] The escalation in Amazon fires may have far-reaching effects on human health and IHS.[1] The major portion (~60%) of the Amazon, covering more than 2 million square miles, is often called “the planet's lungs” and the “carbon sink.”[152],[153] It has been estimated that the Amazon is responsible for processing vast quantities of CO2 and providing about 20% of the world's oxygen.[154],[155] Of importance, about 20% of the rainforest has already been lost, with the tipping point or “danger zone” for human well-being beginning at approximately 25% rainforest lost.[156],[158] While a nontrivial proportion of the Amazon fires may have been set intentionally (e.g., to clear the land for various forms of local economic endeavors), we must remember that this activity only deepens the current climate crisis by destroying CO2 absorbing capacity while actively releasing vast quantities of CO2 into the atmosphere.[157] The current wave of Amazon fires represents the highest number of such events in nearly a decade, with a clear relationship to deforestation activity.[158],[159] In terms of associated health effects, respiratory system exposure to various levels of smoke and volatile chemicals may contribute to both short- and long-term pulmonary sequelae (e.g., acute respiratory infections, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations, and bronchial asthma).[160],[161] Emergency visits due to ocular exposures and complaints of eye irritation have also been noted,[161] along with increased incidence of self-reported symptoms, medication use, outpatient and emergency room visits, hospital admissions, and mortality.[162] The strongest associations were observed between forest fire smoke exposure and asthma.[162] Nonpulmonary organ systems (e.g., the kidneys) may also be affected,[112],[163],[164],[165] but this topic is beyond the scope of the current paper. Similar to other areas of IHS, effective solutions to the truly global problem of the crescendo pattern in the reported number of natural fires will require a highly coordinated international response and great degree of commitment from governments around the world.

Nuclear security

Nuclear incidents can be broadly divided into military and civilian occurrences. Although military events (e.g., nuclear war, nuclear terrorism, nuclear weapons testing, and accidents related to handling of nuclear payloads) are of great importance in the overall contexts of potential modulation of planetary change, such scenarios are beyond the scope of the current chapter. For completeness, we are directing the reader to other sources referenced herein.[9],[166],[167],[168],[169],[170] Within the civilian nuclear incident (CNI) subdomain, radioactive exposures can be broadly classified as either medical (e.g., healthcare equipment used for radiation therapy and reagents used in nuclear medicine)[9],[171] or industrial (e.g., power generation, by-products of medical or military production, and long-term storage of nuclear waste).[9],[172] We will briefly discuss each of these, focusing on potential implications on IHS.

Healthcare-related exposures tend to be contained to the immediate environment surrounding the area of radioactive contamination. One CNI of significance took place in Goiania, Brazil.[171] Another incident occurred in Indiana, Pennsylvania.[171] In both cases, injuries and mortalities were limited to a small number of directly affected individuals. Of note, the Goiania incident involved negligent removal and disposal of 50.9 TBq of cesium-137 from a radiotherapy unit.[173] Environmental contamination requires high-intensity cleanup efforts, with acceptable results but some degree of persistent residual radiation exposure risk.[174] Postevent psychological and behavioral effects (termed “radiophobia” and similar to PTSD) were noted among survivors.[175],[176]

In terms of industrial exposures, the most well studied are the nuclear power plant explosion in Chernobyl, Ukraine,[177] and the more recent nuclear reactor meltdowns at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear electric plant.[178] Both CNIs exemplify the potential for long-term adverse effects of radioactive isotope releases on the immediate surroundings,[179],[180] as well as the more remote, much subtler downstream exposures, secondary to radioisotope concentration within the food chain.[181],[182],[183] Various studies estimated long-term and long-distance effects of resultant radioactive releases.[183],[184],[185],[186] Similar to medical radiation incidents, both social and mental health consequences have been noted among those exposed.[187],[188] Associations with medical conditions, including malignancies, appear to be less specific and weaker.[189],[190],[191] Appropriately administered food and contamination control programs are effective in minimizing the risk of internal radiation exposure.[183],[192]

Pharmaceutical production and supply chains

In 1982, seven people died in the greater Chicago, Illinois metropolitan area, after consuming acetaminophen that had been intentionally laced with potassium cyanide.[193] While the response by the drug manufacturers has since been recognized as a textbook case in corporate crisis and public relations management, the greater concern was the recognition of how vulnerable pharmaceuticals are to potential tampering and bioterrorism.[194],[195] As a result, the United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) and Federal Government – working jointly with pharmaceutical manufacturers – established anti-tampering laws and guidelines to limit the risk of further contamination of the drug supply.[196],[197]

Of concern, such “tampering” events can occur on international scale.[194],[195] This is particularly true when one considers the extensive global supply chain manufacturing process that is involved in the production of consumer pharmaceuticals. Even slight changes in a drug's production – be it the initial formulation, mixing with drug stabilizers, buffers, or binders, all the way to packaging and distribution – can have catastrophic, if not fatal, consequences. The complexity of pharmaceutical development and distribution illustrates that there are numerous opportunities for sabotage, bioterrorism, neglect, or simply human error.[198],[199] Any breakdown, intentional or otherwise, can compromise the safety of medications that millions depend on for health maintenance. Potential observed effects may include avoidance of long-term prescription medications, clinically significant manifestations of fear (e.g., anxiety, post-traumatic stress), as well as economic damage related to combined supply chain disruptions and increased health-care costs.

While there are safeguards built into the entire process to assure quality standards within the pharmaceutical supply chain – including oversight by government agencies, such as the US FDA and European Union European Medicines Agency – the system is not without potential risk(s). Many LMIRs do not have adequate regulatory oversight, established government penalties, and/or adequate public accountability (i.e., public company shareholders) regimes. In addition, for pharmaceuticals that are no longer protected by intellectual property laws, manufacturing may be distributed worldwide, resulting in inconsistent regulatory or quality oversight.[200],[201] In fact, many well-established pharmaceuticals can vary significantly in their drug bio-availabilities and potencies depending on various manufacturing and supply chain factors.[202],[203]

Planetary changes

Our planet is changing and evolving constantly, with continued climate transitions throughout the earth's history becoming the scientifically accepted norm.[204],[205],[206] For the purpose of this discussion, we will refer to this complex set of phenomena simply as “planetary climate change” or PCC. Key areas affected by PCC include agriculture,[207] forestry,[208],[209] species migrations (including the appearance of unopposed invasive species),[210] vector-borne infectious diseases,[211] urban air pollution,[211] wind activity,[115],[212] as well as changes in freshwater availability.[213] Of importance, all of the above elements are closely interrelated, making it difficult to elucidate any binary cause-and-effect relationships, contributing to the highly controversial nature of PCC as a topic. Beyond various direct and indirect effects of PCC on human health,[214] it has been suggested that among the manifestations of the observed human response to PCC are armed conflict and widespread migration.[215],[216]

Perhaps, one of the most impactful current PCC trends is the emergence of increasing temperature variability,[217] which can, in turn, create local weather conditions that regions of the planet may simply not be prepared to handle effectively.[218],[219] One of the proposed models suggests the emergence of “severe and widespread droughts in the next 30–90 years,”[205],[220] with clear implications to other topics discussed in this review, such as food security, EIDs, and human migrations.[221] Another important aspect of PCC management is the need to better understand any effects of solar (and even beyond that, galactic/cosmic) energetic inputs, with special focus on the relationship of such activity on the observed climate behavior patterns.[222],[223] This includes the potential interplay between the earth's magnetic field, solar energetic output, and even the cosmic rays as contributors to the planetary climate conditions, inclusive of the critically important process of cloud formation.[224],[225],[226] Although vast and inadequately understood, the topic of “planetary health” is by default the overarching determinant of human well-being and sustainability.

Public infrastructure and health system resources

Throughout this manuscript, it is evident that adequate public infrastructure and services (PIS) (e.g., transportation, water, power/energy, telecommunications, recreational, and health domains) are of critical importance to health security.[12],[227] PIS are often funded through taxation whereby a portion of gross domestic product (GDP) is invested in the maintenance of infrastructure for the health and welfare of the population.[228] The percentage of GDP spent on PIS correlates with higher overall national GDP, making LMIRs more vulnerable in terms of health security. Most aspects of PIS either directly or indirectly pertain to public health or healthcare delivery, inclusive of complex support mechanisms and structures (e.g., charitable or nongovernmental activity, public–private partnerships, and government spending). There are several models of global public–private ventures which can be broadly grouped into product-, development-, and systems-focused partnerships.[229]

Although the discussion of various possible failure modes in the context of PIS is beyond the scope of this article, it is important to note that deteriorating public infrastructure has been tied to the emergence of epidemiologic risk zones.[230] It follows that regular assessment of PIS is required in ensuring public health preparedness, identifying areas of opportunity, and mitigating any potential threats [Figure 1].[231] The complexity of this topic, and its many interfaces with multiple other IHS domains, stems from the fact that recent technological advances made public infrastructure and health system resources uniquely vulnerable to a broad range of cyber-attacks (discussed elsewhere in this paper); natural disasters (e.g., earthquakes, natural fires, and wind disasters); and various other extrinsic influences (e.g., SM, political forces, and armed conflict).[232],[233],[234],[235]

Social determinants of health

An important component of IHS is the development and continued focus on SDH. This “umbrella” term encompasses the economic and societal conditions that affect an individual's health, highlighting the interconnectedness of global development and IHS. Although there are no strictly defined SDH subdomains, some commonly accepted parameters include access to healthcare, education, employment, socioeconomic status, and safe physical environments (e.g., neighborhood assistance, formal and informal social support networks).[236] These factors are the outcome of public policy and not traditionally considered under the auspices of healthcare but are increasingly recognized as important factors in a society's well-being.

The WHO Commission on Social Determinants of Health (CSDH, 2005–2008) recommended a multi-faceted approach to address inequity in SDH which included housing options, employment options, educational opportunities, universal healthcare, gender equality, fiscal responsibility and opportunity, various social programs, as well as “monitoring, assessment, and evaluation” of intervention effectiveness.[237] In 2011, 125 member states signed the Rio Political Declaration on SDH and this was subsequently adopted as World Health Assembly Resolution 65.8 in 2012. This pledge by member states focuses on equitable policy toward development and health-care, SDH-centric policy-making, and global collaboration and accountability for SDH policy.[238]

SDH implementation is a dynamic process. The inclusion of gender identity as an SDH highlights the importance of continued vigilance to identify and address health inequities.[239] The interlinked nature of these factors makes it evident that SDH and health security can be impacted by nearly every aspect of policy and is not limited by national borders. Such is the case of climate change and its impact on health, including air quality, food security, agriculture, employment, and housing options. With LMIRs disproportionally affected due to insufficient resources, the optimization of SDH for best health outcomes becomes increasingly challenging, from supply chain interruptions to healthcare infrastructure damage.[115],[240] Recognizing the need for continued advocacy, the WHO created a Department of SDH for the 13th General Programme of Work (2019–2023). The final recommendation from the CSDH was for assessment, monitoring, and evaluation of interventions. This is generally consistent with the ACAIM-CG proposed framework [Figure 1]. Work is ongoing to determine the feasibility and accuracy of monitoring for some SDH indicators; however, future national and international programs should consider building intrinsic assessment capacity.[241]

Social media platforms: Dangers of misinformation and misuse

The role of SM platforms in IHS is substantial and is likely to continue to grow.[242] There are certainly many positive aspects of SM, such as the ability to quickly conduct population-level education, surveillance, and even preventive interventions.[242] At the same, there is the “dark side” potential of subverting these powerful platforms to both passively and actively plant misinformation and cause harm.[8] Among the most challenging aspects of SM use in public health and IHS is the need for real-time verification and interception of potentially harmful messaging while at the same time promoting helpful content.[8],[243] The role of SM as a potential agent for the dissemination of harmful medical misinformation is generally under-appreciated. Yet, this emerging IHS threat is not only global but also represents a more pervasive form of harm, where incorrect, erroneous, or outright dangerous information becomes “entrenched” as “accepted truth” or “truthism.”[244] When disseminated widely, through a combination of “likes” and “upvotes,” the factually incorrect or even harmful information may eventually reach the status of “accepted reality” where people tend to believe in the validity of the damaging claim without critically evaluating its merits. In addition to potential harm and elevated risk to individuals, misuse of SM platforms can lead to population-level manifestations through SM “weaponization,” resulting in manipulated public anger and civil unrest.[245] Finally, the unethical opportunism of false promises and exploitation of the naïve can be highlighted by the emergence of unsubstantiated and harmful claims of “disease-modifying behaviors” that may actually lead to significant morbidity and/or mortality,[246],[247] regardless of original intent. One such example is the public health harm created by the anti-vaccination movement, which was greatly aided by the misinformed adoption of SM platforms as “trusted sources.”[8] Due to the truly global reach of SM platforms, the ACAIM-CG urges international cooperation at the governmental level to help curb SM abuse and the propagation of harmful medical misinformation.

Systemic racism and other forms of discrimination

The current COVID-19 pandemic exposed both the severity and the deleterious impact of systemic and structural racism on health outcomes.[17],[248] It has become clear that the observed differences in clinical outcomes cannot be simply explained by expected population differences, pointing to the long-term, deeply embedded effects of systematized inequity across various SDH.[249],[250] The solution to this important problem is as complex as the problem itself and will require a long-term, deliberate society-wide effort.[251] This will involve both integrated and coordinated action across multiple societal sectors, such as healthcare, education, housing, criminal justice/law enforcement, and economics. Self-reflective and intentional systemic transformation of laws, policies, processes, protocols, and practices will be required to create a more equitable present and future. Diversity and inclusion in the work-place, more reflective of society, is a common starting point.

Medicine and the health sciences are well positioned to lead the transformation toward a truly diverse, inclusive, and unbiased environment within which we conduct research, engage in medical education throughout the educational pipeline, advocate for others, and practice clinically. In addition to systemic racism, other forms of systemic discrimination (e.g., gender, sexual orientation, religion, and ethnic/national origin) also require urgent attention. This includes the need to address critical issues related to the other domains of the current IHS agenda, such as access to care, treatment of CHCs, refugee health, SDH, and many other closely intertwined areas. Despite being highlighted by the Sustainable Development Goals, gender inequality continues to be an important cause of health challenges and disparity. Gender discrimination disproportionately impacts women's health through differences in risk exposure, health behaviors, access to care, biased health systems and health research (including data collection), as well as institutional structures and systems. Continued efforts and attention need to be paid to addressing and mitigating health disparities for women. This complex and heterogeneous topic is beyond the scope of the current Executive Summary, but it is hoped that its inclusion in a formal ACAIM-GC statement will compel other academic groups and health authorities to recognize its great importance.

Terrorism, bioterrorism, and related topics

In 2016, there were more than 13,000 terrorist attacks around the world, resulting in over 34,000 deaths.[252] The IHS Expert Community has never faced the current complexity and array of conventional, biological and chemical agents that can cause death, morbidity, disability, social disruption, and economic loss.[253],[254] Humans have engaged in biological and chemical warfare for centuries, with many deplorable acts recorded throughout history.[255],[256],[257] Beyond biological warfare, the use of chemical agents to hurt other humans goes back over 10,000 years, from application of poison to spear tips, to the poisoning of Athenian wells by Sparta, the use of battlefield chemical weapons in the WWI, and the Nazi development of the most lethal nerve agents.[258],[259],[260],[261],[262],[263],[264],[265],[266],[267],[268]

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) defines biological terrorism, or bioterrorism, as the use of biological agents (microbes, toxins, and viruses) as weapons to further personal, religious, or political agendas.[269],[270] Acts of bioterrorism range from a single exposure directed at an individual by another individual or group, to wider scale warfare resulting in mass casualties. This definition may also be extended to include the infliction of harm that involves animals and plants/crops (a.k.a., econo-bioterrorism).[271],[272],[273],[274],[275] Bioterrorism is often considered jointly with chemical terrorism, which is the release of nerve agents (organophosphorus compounds – e.g., sarin gas); vesicants which damage skin and mucous membranes (mustard gas and Lewisite); agents affecting the airway and lungs (i.e., choking agents, phosgene gas); and/or cyanide agents affecting cellular respiration (e.g., hydrogen cyanide and cyanogen chloride).[276],[277],[278] Today's risk of bioterrorism is high because of a normative erosion of the social anathema regarding the use of biological and chemical weapons.[279] In addition, the rise of affordable small-scale science and technology capacity linked with the emergence of asymmetrical warfare (i.e., the interplay between smaller international actors versus traditional monolithic nation states) is a serious threat to populations and resources.[280],[281]

The ACAIM-CG echoes recommendations by the CDC in this domain, with five separate focus areas, each encompassing pertinent training and research: (a) preparedness and prevention; (b) detection and surveillance; (c) diagnosis and characterization of biological and chemical agents; (d) response; and (e) communication.[282] In addition, we advocate strongly for the incorporation of mitigation efforts to optimize the effectiveness of the above-outlined incident response paradigm. To successfully address IHS threats, national and international institutions must provide measures aimed at augmenting public health diagnostics, including microbial recognition and typing, surveillance, enhanced pharmacological therapeutics (e.g., antimicrobials that can overcome resistance), vaccines, chemical sniffers, training, and education.[271] Where applicable, fast-tracking of innovations through various governmental and nongovernmental organizations may help accelerate the work and delivery of new therapies and biological agent-specific remedies (e.g., vaccines, antidotes) to the field. Furthermore, implementation of clinical and field trials during a public health emergency while at the same time respecting cultural differences between societies should be considered. Ensuring the provision of an ethical and just framework for such actions can accelerate the delivery of new therapies to mitigate the potential devastation of biological and chemical terrorism.[63],[283]

 Conclusions



IHS is a complex and highly heterogeneous area of expertise. In this document, the ACAIM-CG presented an Executive Summary of key issues that can impact IHS, including EIDs, CHCs, CIV, planetary changes (volcanic eruptions, earthquakes, wildfires, and climate change), nuclear incidents, CHS, industrialization, globalization, pharmaceutical production, misuse of communication platforms (social media), public health infrastructure, SDH, systemic racism (and other forms of discrimination), terrorism (including bioterrorism), and various forms of warfare. These subdomains can directly and indirectly impact IHS both in the short and long term. When considering IHS, we aim to emphasize the utility of applying a predefined framework to effectively approach health security threats. This framework comprises prevention, detection, assessment, reporting, response, addressing needs, and the repetition of this continuous re-assessment cycle. Appropriate mitigation measures should be built into such system. It is hoped that this collective work will provide a foundation for further research within the redefined, expanded scope of IHS.

Disclosures:

Dr. Tamara Worlton: The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions or policies of Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (USUHS), the Department of Defense (DoD), the Departments of the Army, Navy, or Air Force. Mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.

Other Co-Authors: This manuscript represents individual contributions and opinions of each ACAIM Consensus Group member. These contributions and opinions do not imply endorsement by the Consensus Group members' institutions.

References

1Le NK, Garg M, Izurieta R, Garg SM, Papadimos TJ, Arquilla B, et al. International Health Security: A Summative Assessment by ACAIM Consensus Group, in Contemporary Developments and Perspectives in International Health Security. Vol. 1. London, UK: IntechOpen; 2020. p. 1-34.
2Chiu YW, Weng YH, Su YY, Huang CY, Chang YC, Kuo KN. The nature of international health security. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 2009;18:679-83.
3UN Programme. Human Development Report. New York: Oxford University Press; 1994.
4Reitera P, Thomas CJ, Atkinson PM, Hay SI, Randolph SE, Rogers DJ, et al. Global warming and malaria: A call for accuracy. Lancet Infect Dis 2004;4:323-4.
5Hobson C, Bacon P, Cameron R. Human Security and Natural Disasters. New York, NY: Routledge. 2014.
6Brown T. 'Vulnerability is universal': Considering the place of 'security' and 'vulnerability' within contemporary global health discourse. Soc Sci Med 2011;72:319-26.
7Kay A, Williams O. Global Health Governance: Crisis, Institutions and Political Economy. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan/Springer; 2009.
8Plaza M, Paladino L, Opara IN, Firstenberg MS, Wilson B, Papadimos TJ, et al. The use of distributed consensus algorithms to curtail the spread of medical misinformation. Int J Acad Med 2019;5:93.
9Rojavin Y, Seamon MJ, Tripathi RS, Papadimos TJ, Galwankar S, Kman N, et al. Civilian nuclear incidents: An overview of historical, medical, and scientific aspects. J Emerg Trauma Shock 2011;4:260-72.
10Costello A, Abbas M, Allen A, Ball S, Bell S, Bellamy R, et al. Managing the health effects of climate change: Lancet and University College London Institute for Global health commission. Lancet 2009;373:1693-733.
11Anderson HL 3rd Arquilla B, Firstenberg MS, Garg M, Galwankar SC, Gracias VH, et al. Mission statement of the American College of Academic International Medicine. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci 2017;7:3-7.
12Quinn SC, Kumar S. Health inequalities and infectious disease epidemics: A challenge for global health security. Biosecurity and bioterrorism: Biodefense strategy. Practice Sci 2014;12:263-73.
13Erondu NA, Martin J, Marten R, Ooms G, Yates R, Heymann DL. Building the case for embedding global health security into universal health coverage: A proposal for a unified health system that includes public health. Lancet 2018;392:1482-6.
14Greenaway C, Gushulak BD. Pandemics, Migration and global health security. In: Handbook on Migration and Security. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing; 2017.
15Singu S, Acharya A, Challagundla K, Byrareddy SN. Impact of social determinants of health on the emerging COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. Front Public Health 2020;8:406.
16Huber C, Finelli L, Stevens W. The economic and social burden of the 2014 Ebola outbreak in West Africa. J Infect Dis 2018;218:S698-704.
17Stawicki SP, Jeanmonod R, Miller AC, Paladino L, Gaieski DF, Yaffee AQ, et al. The 2019-2020 novel coronavirus (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) pandemic: A joint American College of Academic International Medicine-World Academic Council of Emergency Medicine Multidisciplinary COVID-19 Working Group Consensus Paper. J Glob Infect Dis 2020;12:47-93.
18Vanthuyne K, Meloni F, Ruiz-Casares M, Rousseau C, Ricard-Guay A. Health workers' perceptions of access to care for children and pregnant women with precarious immigration status: Health as a right or a privilege? Soc Sci Med 2013;93:78-85.
19Langlois EV, Haines A, Tomson G, Ghaffar A. Refugees: Towards better access to health-care services. Lancet 2016;387:319-21.
20Pelly MD, Healing TD. Refugees and disasters. In: Parry E, Godfrey R, Mabet D, Gill G (eds) Principles of medicine in Africa. Cambridge University Press, Singapore, 2004, pp 77–86.
21Rosén F. Collateral Damage: A Candid History of a Peculiar form of Death. London, UK: Hurst Publishers; 2015.
22Hahn S, Anandaraja N, Hennig N, Ripp J. Proceedings of the 5th Annual Mount Sinai Global Health Conference: Health consequences of the war in Iraq. Soc Med 2007;2:144-9.
23Abbara A, Blanchet K, Sahloul Z, Fouad F, Coutts A, Wasim M. The effect of the conflict on Syria's health system and human resources for health. World Health Population 2015;16:87-95.
24Smallman-Raynor MR, Smallman-Raynor M, Cliff A. War Epidemics: An Historical Geography of Infectious Diseases in Military Conflict and Civil Strife, 1850-2000. New York, NY: Oxford University Press on Demand; 2004.
25Cirincione J, Wolfsthal JB, Rajkumar M. Deadly Arsenals: Nuclear, Biological, and Chemical Threats. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment; 2005.
26Pinson RD. Is nanotechnology prohibited by the biological and chemical weapons conventions. Berkeley J Int'l L 2004;22:279.
27Moussavi S, Chatterji S, Verdes E, Tandon A, Patel V, Ustun B. Depression, chronic diseases, and decrements in health: Results from the World Health Surveys. Lancet 2007;370:851-8.
28Francesca C, Ana LN, Jérôme M, Frits T. OECD Health Policy Studies Help Wanted? Providing and Paying for Long-Term Care: Providing and Paying for Long-Term Care. Vol. 2011. Paris, France, EU: OECD Publishing; 2011.
29Bodenheimer T, Pham HH. Primary care: Current problems and proposed solutions. Health Aff (Millwood) 2010;29:799-805.
30Jaul E, Barron J. Age-related diseases and clinical and public health implications for the 85 years old and over population. Front Public Health 2017;5:335.
31United Nations. World Population Prospects; 27 August, 2019. Available from: https://population.un.org/wpp/. [Last accessed on 2020 Aug 30].
32CDC. Healthy Aging in Action 2017; 27 August, 2019. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/aging/pdf/healthy-aging-in-action508.pdf. [Last accessed on 2020 Aug 30].
33Stawicki SP, Kalra S, Jones C, Justiniano CF, Papadimos TJ, Galwankar SC, et al. Comorbidity polypharmacy score and its clinical utility: A pragmatic practitioner's perspective. J Emerg Trauma Shock 2015;8:224-31.
34Schwamm LH. Telehealth: Seven strategies to successfully implement disruptive technology and transform health care. Health Aff (Millwood) 2014;33:200-6.
35O'Donnell O. Access to health care in developing countries: Breaking down demand side barriers. Cad Saude Publica 2007;23:2820-34.
36Unnikrishnan D, Raman D, Joshi D, Ajaikumar BS. Use of home telemedicine for critical illness rehabilitation: An Indian success story. BMJ Case Rep 2019;12:bcr-2018.
37Chauhan V, Galwankar S, Arquilla B, Garg M, Somma SD, El-Menyar A, et al. Novel coronavirus (COVID-19): Leveraging telemedicine to optimize care while minimizing exposures and viral transmission. J Emerg Trauma Shock 2020;13:20-4.
38Bernacki RE, Block SD; American College of Physicians High Value Care Task Force. Communication about serious illness care goals: A review and synthesis of best practices. JAMA Intern Med 2014;174:1994-2003.
39Baxter R, Interrante JR, Domer G, Oskin T, Firstenberg MS, Stawicki SP. Setting up a hospice and palliative care program at a university health network: Turning challenges into opportunities. In: Stawicki SP, Firstenberg MS, editors. Fundamentals of Leadership for Healthcare Professionals: Vol. 2. S.P. Hauppauge, New York: NOVA Science Publishers; 2019.
40Knudson MM, Vassar MJ, Straus EM, Hammond JS, Campbell SD. Surgeons and injury prevention: What you don't know can hurt you! J Am Coll Surg 2001;193:119-24.
41Chauhan V, Galwankar SC, Yellapu V, Perez-Figueroa IJ, Stawicki SP. State of the globe: The trials and tribulations of the COVID-19 pandemic: Separated but together, telemedicine revolution, frontline struggle against “silent hypoxia,” the relentless search for novel therapeutics and vaccines, and the daunting prospect of “COVIFLU”. J Glob Infect Dis 2020;12:39-43.
42Hatchimonji JS, Swendiman RA, Seamon MJ, Nance ML. Trauma does not quarantine: Violence during the COVID-19 pandemic. Ann Surg 2020 Apr 29:10.1097/SLA.0000000000003996.
43Levine PB, McKnight R. Three million more guns: The Spring 2020 spike in firearm sales. 2020. Available from: https://www.brookings.edu/blog/up-front/2020/07/13/three-million-more-guns-the-spring-2020-spike-in-firearm-sales/. [Last accessed on 2020 Aug 30].
44Jones MA, Stone GW. The US gun-control paradox: Gun buyer response to congressional gun-control initiatives. J Bus Econom Res 2015;13:167-74.
45Yancy CW. COVID-19 and African Americans. JAMA 2020;323:1891-1892.
46Corso PS, Mercy JA, Simon TR, Finkelstein EA, Miller TR. Medical costs and productivity losses due to interpersonal and self-directed violence in the United States. Am J Prev Med 2007;32:474-82.
47Weinberger SE, Hoyt DB, Lawrence HC 3rd., Levin S, Henley DE, Alden ER, et al. Firearm-related injury and death in the United States: A call to action from 8 health professional organizations and the American Bar Association. Ann Intern Med 2015;162:513-6.
48McLean RM, Harris P, Cullen J, Maier RV, Yasuda KE, Schwartz BJ, et al. Firearm-related injury and death in the United States: A call to action from the nation's leading physician and public health professional organizations. Ann Intern Med 2019;171:573-7.
49Tsavoussis A, Stawicki SP, Stoicea N, Papadimos TJ. Child-witnessed domestic violence and its adverse effects on brain development: A call for societal self-examination and awareness. Front Public Health 2014;2:178.
50Tsavoussis A, Stawicki SP, Papadimos TJ. Child-witnessed domestic violence: An epidemic in the shadows. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci 2015;5:64-5.
51Hashemian F, Yach D. Public health in a globalizing world: Challenges and opportunities. In: Ritzer G, editor. The Blackwell Companion to Globalization. Malden, MA; Oxford: Blackwell Pub.; 2007. p. 516-38.
52De Cock KM, Simone PM, Davison V, Slutsker L. The new global health. Emerg Infect Dis 2013;19:1192-7.
53Sikka V, Chattu VK, Popli RK, Galwankar SC, Kelkar D, Sawicki SG, et al. The emergence of Zika virus as a global health security threat: A review and a consensus statement of the INDUSEM joint working Group (JWG). J Glob Infect Dis 2016;8:3-15.
54Kalra S, Kelkar D, Galwankar SC, Papadimos TJ, Stawicki SP, Arquilla B, et al. The emergence of Ebola as a global health security threat: From 'lessons learned' to coordinated multilateral containment efforts. J Glob Infect Dis 2014;6:164-77.
55Wojda TR, Valenza PL, Cornejo K, McGinley T, Galwankar SC, Kelkar D, et al. The Ebola outbreak of 2014-2015: From coordinated multilateral action to effective disease containment, vaccine development, and beyond. J Glob Infect Dis 2015;7:127-38.
56Morse SS. Factors in the emergence of infectious diseases. In: Price-Smith AT, editor. Plagues and Politics: Infectious Disease and International Policy. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, New York: Palgrave; 2001. p. 8-26.
57Woelffer GB, Bradford WZ, Paz A, Small PM. A computer-assisted molecular epidemiologic approach to confronting the reemergence of tuberculosis. Am J Med Sci 1996;311:17-22.
58Kasowski EJ, Garten RJ, Bridges CB. Influenza pandemic epidemiologic and virologic diversity: Reminding ourselves of the possibilities. Clin Infect Dis 2011;52 Suppl 1:S44-9.
59World Health Organization. WHO Global Strategy for Containment of Antimicrobial Resistance. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
60Tappero JW, Tauxe RV. Lessons learned during public health response to cholera epidemic in Haiti and the Dominican Republic. Emerg Infect Dis 2011;17:2087-93.
61Gushulak BD, MacPherson DW. Globalization of infectious diseases: The impact of migration. Clin Infect Dis 2004;38:1742-8.
62Gubler DJ. Dengue, urbanization and globalization: The unholy trinity of the 21(st) century. Trop Med Health 2011;39:3-11.
63Papadimos TJ, Marcolini EG, Hadian M, Hardart GE, Ward N, Levy MM. Ethics of outbreaks position statement. Part 1: Therapies, treatment limitations, and duty to treat. Critical Care Med 2018;46:1842-55.
64Snacken R, Kendal AP, Haaheim LR, Wood JM. The next influenza pandemic: Lessons from Hong Kong, 1997. Emerg Infect Dis 1999;5:195-203.
65Pinstrup-Andersen P. Food security: Definition and measurement. Food Sec 2009;1:5-7.
66Dilley M, Boudreau TE. Coming to terms with vulnerability: A critique of the food security definition. Food Policy 2001;26:229-47.
67Leung TL, Bates AE. More rapid and severe disease outbreaks for aquaculture at the tropics: Implications for food security. J Applied Ecol 2013;2:215-22.
68Ujunwa A, Okoyeuzu C, Kalu EU. Armed conflict and food security in West Africa: Socioeconomic perspective. Int J Soc Econom 2019;46:182-198.
69Hadley C, Sellen D. Food security and child hunger among recently resettled Liberian refugees and asylum seekers: A pilot study. J Immigr Minor Health 2006;8:369-75.
70Singleton GR, Belmain S, Brown PR, Aplin K, Htwe NM. Impacts of rodent outbreaks on food security in Asia. Wildlife Res 2010;37:355-9.
71Dara SK, Barringer L, Arthurs SP. Lycorma delicatula (Hemiptera: Fulgoridae): A new invasive pest in the United States. J Integrated Pest Manag 2015;6:20.
72Murali Sankar P, Shreedevasena S. Desert locusts (Schistocerca gregaria)-A global threatening transboundary pest for food security. Biotica Res Today 2020;2 Suppl 5:389-91.
73Austin G. African Economic Development and Colonial Legacies. Vol. 1. Geneva, Switzerland: Institut de Hautes Etudes Internationales et du Développement; 2010.
74Hufnagel L, Brockmann D, Geisel T. Forecast and control of epidemics in a globalized world. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004;101:15124-9.
75Saker L, Lee K, Cannito B, Gilmore A, Campbell-Lendrum D. Globalization and Infectious Diseases: A Review of the Linkages. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2004.
76Estrada MA, Park D, Khan A, Tahir M. Is Terrorism, Poverty, and Refugees the Dark Side of Globalization? Quality & Quantity. 2019;53:1823-35.
77Moghaddam FM. How Globalization Spurs Terrorism: The Lopsided benefits of “One World” and Why that Fuels Violence. Westport, CT: Praeger Security International; 2008.
78Nassar JR. Globalization and Terrorism: The Migration of Dreams and Nightmares. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers; 2009.
79Von Solms R, Van Niekerk J. From information security to cyber security. Comput Sec 2013;38:97-102.
80Luna R, Rhine E, Myhra M, Sullivan R, Kruse CS. Cyber threats to health information systems: A systematic review. Technol Health Care 2016;24:1-9.
81Perakslis ED. Cybersecurity in health care. N Engl J Med 2014;371:395-7.
82Zhang H, Nakamura T, Sakurai K. Security and Trust Issues on Digital Supply Chain. In: 2019 IEEE Intl Conf on Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing, Intl Conf on Pervasive Intelligence and Computing, Intl Conf on Cloud and Big Data Computing, Intl Conf on Cyber Science and Technology Congress (DASC/PiCom/CBDCom/CyberSciTech) IEEE; 2019.
83Blessman D. Protecting your software supply Chain. Risk Manag 2019;66:10-1.
84Wirth A. The times they are a-Changin': Part two. Biomed Instrum Technol 2018;52:236-40.
85Radanliev P, De Roure D, Cannady S, Montalvo RM, Nicolescu R, Huth M. Economic Impact of IoT Cyber Risk-Analysing Past and Present to Predict the Future Developments in IoT Risk Analysis and IoT Cyber Insurance; 2018.
86Strielkina A, Uzun D, Kharchenko V. Modelling of healthcare IoT using the queueing theory. In: 2017 9th IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Data Acquisition and Advanced Computing Systems: Technology and Applications (IDAACS), IEEE; 2017.
87Strielkina A, Kharchenko V, Uzun D. Availability models for healthcare IoT systems: Classification and research considering attacks on vulnerabilities. In: 2018 IEEE 9th International Conference on Dependable Systems, Services and Technologies (DESSERT) IEEE; 2018.
88Patyal M, Sampalli S, Ye Q, Rahman M. Multi-layered defense architecture against ransomware. Int J Bus Cyber Sec 2017;1:2.
89Chernyshev M, Zeadally S, Baig Z. Healthcare data breaches: Implications for digital forensic readiness. J Med Syst 2018;43:7.
90Order E. Executive Order-Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity; 2013.
91Kohane IS, Greenspun P, Fackler J, Cimino C, Szolovits P. Building national electronic medical record systems via the World Wide Web. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1996;3:191-207.
92Neuhaus C, Polze A, Chowdhuryy MM. Survey on Healthcare IT Systems: Standards, Regulations and Security. Potsdam, Germany: Universitätsverlag Potsdam; 2011.
93Braunstein ML. Health Informatics in the Cloud. New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media; 2012.
94Cerrato P, Halamka J. The Transformative Power of Mobile Medicine: Leveraging Innovation, Seizing Opportunities and Overcoming Obstacles of mHealth. London, UK: Academic Press; 2019.
95Mercuri RT. The HIPAA-Potamus in health care data security. Communicat ACM 2004;47:25-8.
96Zhang K, Yang K, Liang X, Su Z, Shen X, Luo HH. Security and privacy for mobile healthcare networks: From a quality of protection perspective. IEEE Wireless Communicat 2015;22:104-12.
97AHA. Integration of Cyber and Physical Security Functions and Technology. AHA; 2018. Available from: https://www.aha.org/education-events/integration-cyber-and-physical-security-functions-and-technology. [Last accessed on 2020 Aug 30].
98AHA. Cybersecurity Must be a Priority for Everyone. AHA; 14 December, 2017. Available from: https://www.aha.org/news/blog/2017-12-04-cybersecurity-must-be-priority-everyone. [Last accessed on 2020 Aug 30].
99Whitmee S, Haines A, Beyrer C, Boltz F, Capon AG, de Souza Dias BF, et al. Safeguarding human health in the Anthropocene epoch: Report of the Rockefeller Foundation-Lancet Commission on Planetary Health. Lancet 2015;386:1973-2028.
100Prüss-Üstün A, Corvalán C. Preventing Disease Through Healthy Environments: Towards an Estimate of the Environmental Burden of Disease. Eng Sanit Ambient. 2007;12:115-116.
101GBD 2016 Risk Factors Collaborators. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990-2016: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet 2017;390:1345-422.
102Myers SS, Patz JA. Emerging threats to human health from global environmental change. Ann Rev Environ Res 2009;34:223-52.
103Dyer O. Beirut's battered hospitals struggle in aftermath of explosion. Br Med J Publish Group 2020;370:m3171.
104Mehan A, Jansen M. Beirut Blast: A Port City in Crisis; 2020.
105Ahirwar R, Mondal PR. Prevalence of obesity in India: A systematic review. Diabetes Metab Syndr 2019;13:318-21.
106Kiwanuka E. The health impact of obesity. In: Obesity. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2020. p. 73-83.
107Lim HJ, Xue H, Wang Y. Global trends in obesity. In: Handbook of Eating and Drinking: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2020. p. 1217-35.
108Quadrelli R, Peterson S. The Energy-Climate Challenge: Recent Trends in CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion. Energy Policy 2007;35. p. 5938-52.
109Tucker M. Carbon dioxide emissions and global GDP. Ecol Econom 1995;15:215-23.
110Watts N, Amann M, Arnell N, Ayeb-Karlsson S, Belesova K, Berry H, et al. The 2018 report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: Shaping the health of nations for centuries to come. Lancet 2018;392:2479-514.
111Loladze I. Hidden shift of the ionome of plants exposed to elevated CO-depletes minerals at the base of human nutrition. Elife 2014;3:e02245.
112Haines A, Ebi K. The imperative for climate action to protect health. N Engl J Med 2019;380:263-73.
113Newland K. Climate Change and Migration Dynamics. Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute; 2011.
114Khasnis AA, Nettleman MD. Global warming and infectious disease. Arch Med Res 2005;36:689-96.
115Marchigiani R, Gordy S, Cipolla J, Adams RC, Evans DC, Stehly C, et al. Wind disasters: A comprehensive review of current management strategies. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci 2013;3:130-42.
116Scheffran J, Battaglini A. Climate and conflicts: The security risks of global warming. Region Environ Change 2011;11:27-39.
117Reina Ortiz M, Le NK, Sharma V, Hoare I, Quizhpe E, Teran E, et al. Post-earthquake Zika virus surge: Disaster and public health threat amid climatic conduciveness. Sci Rep 2017;7:15408.
118Carlsen HK, Gislason T, Benediktsdottir B, Kolbeinsson TB, Hauksdottir A, Thorsteinsson T, et al. A survey of early health effects of the Eyjafjallajokull 2010 eruption in Iceland: A population-based study. BMJ Open 2012;2:e000343.
119Doocy S, Daniels A, Dooling S, Gorokhovich Y. The human impact of volcanoes: A historical review of events 1900-2009 and systematic literature review. PLoS Curr 2013;5:1-27.
120New Zealand Herald. White Island Volcano Erupts in Bay of Plenty: 6 dead, 8 Missing, 30 in Hospital; 2019. Available from: https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm? c_id=1&objected=12292240. [Last accessed on 2019 Dec 10].
121Baxter PJ, Jenkins S, Seswandhana R, Komorowski JC, Dunn K, Purser D, et al. Human survival in volcanic eruptions: Thermal injuries in pyroclastic surges, their causes, prognosis and emergency management. Burns 2017;43:1051-69.
122Hlodversdottir H, Petursdottir G, Carlsen HK, Gislason T, Hauksdottir A. Long-term health effects of the Eyjafjallajökull volcanic eruption: A prospective cohort study in 2010 and 2013. BMJ Open 2016;6:e011444.
123Carlsen HK, Hauksdottir A, Valdimarsdottir UA, Gíslason T, Einarsdottir G, Runolfsson H, et al. Health effects following the Eyjafjallajokull volcanic eruption: A cohort study. BMJ Open 2012;2: e001851.
124Nguyen HT, Wijayanti LW, Kim K, Lee WK, Lee CH, Shin K. High prevalence of cognitive impairment among students near Mount Merapi: A case study. J Exerc Rehabil 2018;14:573-80.
125Gissurardóttir ÓS, Hlodversdóttir H, Thordardóttir EB, Pétursdóttir G, Hauksdóttir A. Mental health effects following the eruption in Eyjafjallajökull volcano in Iceland: A population-based study. Scand J Public Health 2019;47:251-9.
126Hlodversdottir H, Thorsteinsdottir H, Thordardottir EB, Njardvik U, Petursdottir G, Hauksdottir A. Long-term health of children following the Eyjafjallajökull volcanic eruption: A prospective cohort study. Eur J Psychotraumatol 2018;9:1442601.
127Warsini S, Buettner P, Mills J, West C, Usher K. Post-traumatic stress disorder among survivors two years after the 2010 Mount Merapi volcano eruption: A survey study. Nurs Health Sci 2015;17:173-80.
128PAHO-WHO. Health Emergencies: Volcanic Eruptions; 2019. Available from: https://www.paho.org/disasters/index.php?Itemid=1171&lang=en. [Last accessed on 2019 Aug 25].
129Shruti VC, Rodríguez-Espinosa PF, Martinez-Tavera E, Hernández-Gonzalez D. Metal concentrations in recent ash fall of Popocatepetl volcano 2016, Central Mexico: Is human health at risk? Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 2018;162:324-33.
130Gudmundsson MT, Pedersen R, Vogfjörd K, Thorbjarnardóttir B, Jakobsdóttir S, Roberts MJ. Eruptions of Eyjafjallajökull volcano, Iceland. Eos Trans Am Geophys Union 2010;91:190-1.
131Budd L, Griggs S, Howarth D, Ison S. A fiasco of volcanic proportions? Eyjafjallajökull and the closure of European airspace. Mobilities 2011;6:31-40.
132Adey P, Anderson B. Anticipation, materiality, event: The Icelandic ash cloud disruption and the security of mobility. Mobilities 2011;6:11-20.
133DHS. Build a kit: Basic Disaster Supplies Kit; 29 December, 2019. Available from: https://www.ready.gov/kit. [Last accessed on 2020 Aug 30].
134CDC. Volcanoes 2018; 25 August, 2019. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/disasters/volcanoes/index.html. [Last accessed on 2020 Aug 30].
135Warsini S, Mills J, West C, Usher K. Living through a volcanic eruption: Understanding the experience of survivors as a phenomenological existential phenomenon. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2016;25:206-13.
136Steinle S, Sleeuwenhoek A, Mueller W, Horwell CJ, Apsley A, Davis A. The effectiveness of respiratory protection worn by communities to protect from volcanic ash inhalation. Part II: Total inward leakage tests. Int J Hygiene Environ Health 2018;221:977-84.
137Galea KS, Covey J, Mutia Timur S, Horwell CJ, Nugroho F, Mueller W. Short communication: Health interventions in volcanic eruptions-community wearability assessment of respiratory protection against volcanic ash from Mt Sinabung, Indonesia. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2018;15:2359.
138Tappero JW, Cassell CH, Bunnell RE, Angulo FJ, Craig A, Pesik N, et al. US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Its Partners' Contributions to Global Health Security. Emerg Infect Dis 2017;23(Suppl 1):S5.
139Valecha R, Oh O, Rao R. An Exploration of Collaboration over Time in Collective Crisis Response during the Haiti 2010 Earthquake; 2013.
140Fugate C. Written statement. In: Subcommittee Hearing: Understanding the Power of Social Media as a Communication Tool in the Aftermath of Disasters. Subcommittee on Disaster Recovery and Intergovernmental Affairs. Washington, DC: Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, US Congress. Senate; 2011.
141Burkle FM Jr. Public Health Issues in Disaster Management. The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Health, Illness, Behavior, and Society; 2014. p. 1-14.
142Chen B, Halliday TJ, Fan VY. The impact of internal displacement on child mortality in post-earthquake Haiti: A difference-in-differences analysis. Int J Equity Health 2016;15:114.
143Frerichs RR. Deadly River: Cholera and Cover-Up in Post-Earthquake Haiti. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; 2016.
144Andrade EL, Barrett ND, Edberg MC, Rivera MI, Latinovic L, Seeger MW, et al. Mortality reporting and rumor generation: An assessment of crisis and emergency risk communication following Hurricane María in Puerto Rico. J Int Crisis Risk Communicat Res 2020;3:2.
145Santos-Burgoa C, Goldman A, Andrade E, Barrett N, Colon-Ramos U, Edberg M, et al. Ascertainment of the Estimated Excess Mortality from Hurricane Maria in Puerto Rico; 2018. Retrieved fromhttps://hsrc.himmelfarb.gwu.edu/sphhs_global_facpubs/288. [Last accessed on 2020 Aug 30].
146Shi H, Jiang Z, Zhao B, Li Z, Chen Y, Gu Y, et al. Modeling study of the air quality impact of record-breaking Southern California wildfires in December 2017. J Geophys Res Atmos 2019;124:6554-70.
147Tedim F, Leone V, Coughlan M, Bouillon C, Xanthopoulos G, Royé D, et al. 1.1 Extreme wildfires: A true challenge for societies. Extreme Wildfire Events and Disasters: Root Causes and New Management Strategies; 2019. p. 1.
148Dowdy AJ, Ye H, Pepler A, Thatcher M, Osbrough SL, Evans JP, et al. Future changes in extreme weather and pyroconvection risk factors for Australian wildfires. Sci Rep 2019;9:10073.
149Lim EP, Hendon HH, Boschat G, Hudson D, Thompson DW, Dowdy AJ, et al. Australian hot and dry extremes induced by weakenings of the stratospheric polar vortex. Nature Geosci 2019;12:896-901.
150Di Virgilio G, Evans JP, Blake SA, Armstrong M, Dowdy AJ, Sharples J, et al. Climate change increases the potential for extreme wildfires. Geophys Res Lett 2019;46:8517-26.
151Fonseca MG, Alves LM, Aguiar APD, Arai E, Anderson LO, Rosan TM, et al. Effects of climate and land-use change scenarios on fire probability during the 21st century in the Brazilian Amazon. Glob Chang Biol 2019;25:2931-46.
152Romano CS. Brazilian government policies towards the Amazon rain forest: From a developmental ideology to an environmental consciousness. Colo J Intl Envtl L Poly 1999;10:65.
153Rubenstein ES. It's Complicated: The Role of Land in Global Warming; 2020. Available from: https://npg.org/library/forum-series/its-complicated-fp.html. [Last accessed on 2020 Aug 30].
154Reis E, Margulis S. Options for Slowing Amazon Jungle Clearing. Global Warming: Economic Policy Responses; 1991. p. 335-75.
155Tollefson J. Climate: Counting carbon in the Amazon. Nature 2009;461:1048-52.
156Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K, Persson Š, Chapin III FS, Lambin EJ, et al. Planetary Boundaries: Exploring the Safe Operating Space for Humanity. Ecology and Society; 2009;14:2.
157Spratt D, Sutton P. Climate Code Red; 2008. Collingwood, Victoria, Australia: Friends of Earth.
158da Silva SS, Fearnside PM, de Alencastro Graça PM, Brown IF, Alencar A, de Melo AW. Dynamics of forest fires in the Southwestern Amazon. Forest Ecol Manag 2018;424:312-22.
159Escobar H. Amazon Fires Clearly Linked to Deforestation, Scientists Say. American Association for the Advancement of Science; 2019.
160Frankenberg E, McKee D, Thomas D. Health consequences of forest fires in Indonesia. Demography 2005;42:109-29.
161Duclos P, Sanderson LM, Lipsett M. The 1987 forest fire disaster in California: Assessment of emergency room visits. Arch Environ Health 1990;45:53-8.
162Henderson SB, Johnston FH. Measures of forest fire smoke exposure and their associations with respiratory health outcomes. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2012;12:221-7.
163Sorensen C, Garcia-Trabanino R. A new era of climate medicine Addressing heat-triggered renal disease. N Engl J Med 2019;381:693-6.
164Johnson RJ, Wesseling C, Newman LS. Chronic kidney disease of unknown cause in agricultural communities. N Engl J Med 2019;380:1843-52.
165Roncal Jimenez CA, Ishimoto T, Lanaspa MA, Rivard CJ, Nakagawa T, Ejaz AA, et al. Fructokinase activity mediates dehydration-induced renal injury. Kidney Int 2014;86:294-302.
166Coleman CN, Lurie N. Emergency medical preparedness for radiological/nuclear incidents in the United States. J Radiol Prot 2012;32:N27-32.
167Coleman CN, Sullivan JM, Bader JL, Murrain-Hill P, Koerner JF, Garrett AL, et al. Public health and medical preparedness for a nuclear detonation: The nuclear incident medical enterprise. Health Phys 2015;108:149-60.
168Bentz JA, Blumenthal DJ, Potter BA. It's all about the data: Responding to international chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear incidents. Bulletin Atomic Sci 2014;70:57-68.
169Tompson A, Bruton C, Pawloski G, Smith D, Bourcier W, Shumaker D, et al. On the evaluation of groundwater contamination from underground nuclear tests. Environl Geol 2002;42:235-47.
170Malone RC, Auer LH, Glatzmaier GA, Wood MC, Toon OB. Nuclear winter: Three-dimensional simulations including interactive transport, scavenging, and solar heating of smoke. J Geophys Res 1986;91:1039-53.
171Alers A, Salen P, Yellapu V, Garg M, Bendas C, Cardiges N, et al. Fundamentals of Medical Radiation Safety: Focus on Reducing Short-Term and Long-Term Harmful Exposures. London, UK: IntechOpen. 2019.
172Hipkin J, Paynter R. Radiation exposures to the workforce from naturally occurring radioactivity in industrial processes. Radiat Protect Dosimetry 1991;36:97-100.
173Sakamoto-Hojo ET. Lessons from the accident with137 cesium in Goiania, Brazil: Contributions to biological dosimetry in case of human exposure to ionizing radiation. Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen 2018;836:72-7.
174Anjos RM, Umisedo NK, Facure A, Yoshimura EM, Gomes PR, Okuno E. Goiânia: 12 years after the 137Cs radiological accident. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2002;101:201-4.
175Collins DL, de Carvalho AB. Chronic stress from the Goiania 137Cs radiation accident. Behav Med 1993;18:149-57.
176Pastel RH. Radiophobia: Long-term psychological consequences of Chernobyl. Military Med 2002;167 Suppl 1:134-6.
177Haynes V, Bojcun B. The Chernobyl Disaster; 1988.
178Gauntt R, Kalinich D, Cardoni J, Phillips J, Goldmann A, Pickering S, et al. Fukushima Daiichi accident study (status as of April 2012). Sandia Report Sand; 2012. p. 6173.
179Evrard O, Chartin C, Onda Y, Patin J, Lepage H, Lefèvre I, et al. Evolution of radioactive dose rates in fresh sediment deposits along coastal rivers draining Fukushima contamination plume. Sci Rep 2013;3:3079.
180Møller AP, Barnier F, Mousseau TA. Ecosystems effects 25 years after Chernobyl: Pollinators, fruit set and recruitment. Oecologia 2012;170:1155-65.
181Tateda Y, Tsumune D, Tsubono T. Simulation of radioactive cesium transfer in the Southern Fukushima Coastal Biota using a dynamic food chain transfer model. J Environ Radioact 2013;124:1-2.
182Rissanen K, Rahola T. Radiocesium in Lichens and Reindeer after the Chernobyl Accident. Rangifer; 1990. p. 55-61.
183Buck EH, Upton HF, Folger P. Effects of Radiation from Fukushima Daiichi on the US Marine Environment. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service. 2011.
184Ten Hoeve JE, Jacobson MZ. Worldwide health effects of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear accident. Energy Environ Sci 2012;5:8743-57.
185Chino M, Nakayama H, Nagai H, Terada H, Katata G, Yamazawa H. Preliminary estimation of release amounts of 131I and 137Cs accidentally discharged from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant into the atmosphere. J Nucl Sci Technol 2011;48:1129-34.
186Fry F, Clarke R, O'riordan M. Early estimates of UK radiation doses from the Chernobyl reactor. Nature 1986;321:193.
187Bromet EJ. Mental health consequences of the Chernobyl disaster. J Radiol Prot 2012;32:N71-5.
188Marples DR. The Social Impact of the Chernobyl Disaster. London, UK: Macmillan Press/Springer; 1988.
189Yamashita S, Suzuki S. Risk of thyroid cancer after the Fukushima nuclear power plant accident. Respir Investig 2013;51:128-33.
190Takamura N, Orita M, Saenko V, Yamashita S, Nagataki S, Demidchik Y. Radiation and risk of thyroid cancer: Fukushima and Chernobyl. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2016;4:647.
191Evangeliou N, Balkanski Y, Cozic A, Møller AP. Global and local cancer risks after the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant accident as seen from Chernobyl: A modeling study for radiocaesium ((134)Cs & (137)Cs). Environ Int 2014;64:17-27.
192Tsubokura M, Kato S, Nihei M, Sakuma Y, Furutani T, Uehara K, et al. Limited internal radiation exposure associated with resettlements to a radiation-contaminated homeland after the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster. PLoS One 2013;8:e81909.
193Markel H. How the Tylenol Murders of 1982 Changed the Way We Consume Medication; 2014.
194MCKay C, Scharman EJ. Intentional and inadvertent chemical contamination of food, water, and medication. Emerg Med Clin North Am 2015;33:153-77.
195Raina MacIntyre C, Engells TE, Scotch M, Heslop DJ, Gumel AB, Poste G, et al. Converging and emerging threats to health security. Environ Syst Decis 2018;38:198-207.
196Government Publishing Office. Title 18: Crimes and Criminal Procedures; 30 August, 2010. Available from: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2010-title18/pdf/USCODE-2010-title18-partI-chap65-sec1365.pdf. [Last accessed on 2020 Aug 30].
197Bix L, Bello NM, Auras R, Ranger J, Lapinski MK. Examining the conspicuousness and prominence of two required warnings on OTC pain relievers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009;106:6550-5.
198Osterholm MT, Schwartz J. Living Terrors. Delta: What America Needs to Know to Survive the Coming Bioterrorist Catastrophe; 2007.
199Evans NG, Selgelid MJ. Biosecurity and open-source biology: The promise and peril of distributed synthetic biological technologies. Sci Eng Ethics 2015;21:1065-83.
200Manolis AS. Carcinogenic impurities in generic Sartans: An issue of authorities' control or a problem with generics? Rhythmos 2019;14:23-6.
201Shanley A. After Valsartan Recalls, Regulators Grapple with Nitrosamine Contamination in APIs; 2018.
202FDA. Levothyroxine Sodium Product Information; 29 August 2015. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/drugs/postmarket-drug-safety-information-patients-and-providers/levothyroxine-sodium-product-information. [Last accessed on 2020 Aug 30].
203Tamargo J, Rosano G. Low quality of some generic cardiovascular medicinal products represents a matter for growing concern. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother 2020;6:176-87.
204Dansgaard W, Johnsen SJ, Clausen HB, Dahl-Jensen D, Gundestrup NS, Hammer CU, et al. Evidence for general instability of past climate from a 250-Kyr Ice-Core Record. Nature 1993;364:218.
205Dai A. Increasing drought under global warming in observations and models. Nature Climate Change 2013;3:52.
206Saltzman ES, Petit JR, Jouzel J, Raynaud D, Barkov NI, Barnola JM, et al. Climate and atmospheric history of the past 420,000 years from the Vostok ice core, Antarctica. Nature 1999;399:429.
207Howden SM, Soussana JF, Tubiello FN, Chhetri N, Dunlop M, Meinke H. Adapting agriculture to climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007;104:19691-6.
208Seidl R, Thom D, Kautz M, Martin-Benito D, Peltoniemi M, Vacchiano G, et al. Forest disturbances under climate change. Nat Clim Chang 2017;7:395-402.
209McDowell NG, Allen CD. Darcy's law predicts widespread forest mortality under climate warming. Nature Climate Change 2015;5:669.
210La Sorte FA, Fink D. Projected changes in prevailing winds for transatlantic migratory birds under global warming. J Anim Ecol 2017;86:273-84.
211McMichael AJ, Bennett CM. Global environmental change and human health, In: The Ashgate Research Companion to the Globalization of Health. New York, NY: Routledge; 2016. p. 119-38.
212Emanuel K, Sundararajan R, Williams J. Hurricanes and global warming: Results from downscaling IPCC AR4 simulations. Bulletin Am Meteorol Soc 2008;89:347-68.
213Gosling SN, Arnell NW. A global assessment of the impact of climate change on water scarcity. Climatic Change 2016;134:371-85.
214Portier CJ, Thigpen TK, Carter SR, Dilworth CH, Grambsch AE, Gohlke J, et al. A Human Health Perspective on Climate Change: A Report Outlining the Research Needs on the Human Health Effects of Climate Change. Environmental Health Perspectives/National Institute of Environmental Health; 2017.
215Sachs JD. Toward an international migration regime. Am Econom Rev 2016;106:451-55.
216Plante C, Anderson CA. Global Warming and Violent Behavior. APS Observer; 2017. p. 30.
217Schär C, Vidale PL, Lüthi D, Frei C, Häberli C, Liniger MA, et al. The role of increasing temperature variability in European summer heatwaves. Nature 2004;427:332-6.
218Zolina O, Simmer C, Gulev SK, Kollet S. Changing structure of European precipitation: Longer wet periods leading to more abundant rainfalls. Geophys Res Lett 2010;37:L06704.
219Lee JE, Lintner BR, Boyce CK, Lawrence PJ. Land use change exacerbates tropical South American drought by sea surface temperature variability. Geophys Res Lett 2011;38:L19706.
220Dai A. Drought under global warming: A review. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 2011;2:45-65.
221Kita SM, Raleigh CH. Environmental Migration and International Political Security. In: Routledge Handbook of Environmental Displacement and Migration. ROUTLEDGE in Association with GSE Research; 2018. p. 356-69.
222Solanki SK, Usoskin IG, Kromer B, Schüssler M, Beer J. Unusual activity of the Sun during recent decades compared to the previous 11,000 years. Nature 2004;431:1084-7.
223Bhattacharya AB, Lichtman JM, Banerjee A, Sarkar E. Energetic particles propagation: A probable link between solar activity and terrestrial climate. J Sci Eng Health Manag 2017;5:42.
224Svensmark H. Cosmic rays, clouds and climate. Europhys News 2015;46:26-9.
225Frigo E, Antonelli F, da Silva DS, Lima P, Pacca II, Bageston JV. Effects of Solar Activity and Galactic Cosmic Ray Cycles on the Modulation of the Annual Average Temperature at two Sites in Southern Brazil. in Annales Geophysicae, Copernicus GmbH; 2018.
226Lam MM, Tinsley BA. Solar wind-atmospheric electricity-cloud microphysics connections to weather and climate. J Atmosph Solar Terrestrial Phys 2016;149:277-90.
227CFI. Public Infrastructure: Infrastructure Facilities, Systems, and Structures that are Owned and Operated by the Government; 2020. Available from: https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/knowledge/economics/public-infrastructure/. [Last accessed on 2020 Aug 30].
228Stupak JM. Economic Impact of Infrastructure Investment; 23 August, 2018. Available from: https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R44896.pdf. [Last accessed on 2020 Aug 30].
229Buse K, Walt G. Global public-private partnerships: Part II--What are the health issues for global governance? Bull World Health Organ 2000;78:699-709.
230Hirschfeld K. Failing states as epidemiologic risk zones: Implications for global health security. Health Secur 2017;15:288-95.
231Santiago DL. Assessment of Public Health Infrastructure to Determine Public Health Preparedness. Naval Postgraduate School Monterey CA; 2006.
232Smith FL 3rd. Malware and disease: Lessons from cyber intelligence for public health surveillance. Health Secur 2016;14:305-14.
233Miller AC, Khan AM, Ziad S. Ransomware and Academic International Medicine, in Contemporary Developments and Perspectives in International Health Security. Vol. 1. London, UK: IntechOpen; 2020.
234Diaz JH. The influence of global warming on natural disasters and their public health outcomes. Am J Disaster Med 2007;2:33-42.
235Daw MA, El-Bouzedi A, Dau AA. The assessment of efficiency and coordination within the Libyan health care system during the armed conflict-2011. Clin Epidemiol Global Health 2016;4:120-7.
236Artiga S, Hinton E. Beyond Health Care: The Role of Social Determinants in Promoting Health and Health Equity; 2018. Available from: https://www.kff.org/disparities-policy/issue-brief/beyond-health-care-the-role-of-social-determinants-in-promoting-health-and-health-equity/. [Last accessed on 2019 Dec 12].
237Marmot M, Friel S, Bell R, Houweling TA, Taylor S; Commission on Social Determinants of Health. Closing the gap in a generation: Health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Lancet 2008;372:1661-9.
238World Health Organization. Sixty-Fifth World Health Assembly: Decisions and List of Resolutions. World Health Organization; 28 December, 2019. Available from: http://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA65/A65_DIV3-en.pdf. [Last accessed on 2020 Aug 30].
239Pega F, Veale JF. The case for the World Health Organization's Commission on Social Determinants of Health to address gender identity. Am J Public Health 2015;105:e58-62.
240Salas RN, Malina D, Solomon CG. Prioritizing health in a changing climate. N Engl J Med 2019;381:773-4.
241Blas E, Ataguba JE, Huda TM, Bao GK, Rasella D, Gerecke MR. The feasibility of measuring and monitoring social determinants of health and the relevance for policy and programme A qualitative assessment of four countries. Glob Health Action 2016;9:29002.
242Velasco E, Agheneza T, Denecke K, Kirchner G, Eckmanns T. Social media and internet-based data in global systems for public health surveillance: A systematic review. Milbank Quarterly 2014;92:7-33.
243Stawicki SP, Firstenberg MS, Papadimos TJ. The growing role of social media in international health security: The good, the bad, and the ugly. In: Masys AJ, Izurieta R, Reina Ortiz M, editors. Global Health Security: Recognizing Vulnerabilities, Creating Opportunities. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2019.
244Kienhues D, Jucks R, Bromme R. Sealing the gateways for post-truthism: Reestablishing the epistemic authority of science. Educ Psychol 2020;55:144-54.
245Reina-Ortiz M, Hoare I, Sharma V, Izurieta R. State of the globe: Ebola outbreak in the Western world: Are we really ready? J Glob Infect Dis 2015;7:53-5.
246Oyeyemi SO, Gabarron E, Wynn R. Ebola, Twitter, and misinformation: A dangerous combination? BMJ 2014;349:g6178.
247Zeng J. Contesting Rumours on Social Media during Acute Events: The 2014 Sydney Siege and 2015 Tianjin Blasts. Queensland University of Technology; 2019.
248Gray DM 2nd Anyane-Yeboa A, Balzora S, Issaka RB, May FP. COVID-19 and the other pandemic: Populations made vulnerable by systemic inequity. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020;6:1-3.
249Thakur N, Lovinsky-Desir S, Bime C, Wisnivesky JP, Celedón JC; Health Equality and Diversity Committee of the American Thoracic Society. The structural and social determinants of the racial/ethnic disparities in the U.S. COVID-19 pandemic: What's our role? Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2020;7:1-28.
250Turner-Musa J, Ajayi O, Kemp L. Examining social determinants of health, stigma, and COVID-19 disparities. Healthcare (Basel) 2020;8:168.
251Evans MK, Rosenbaum L, Malina D, Morrissey S, Rubin EJ. Diagnosing and Treating Systemic Racism. N Engl J Med 2020;383:274-6.
252START. Global Terrorism Database; 02 September, 2019. Available from: https://www.start.umd.edu/gtd/. [Last accessed on 2020 Aug 30].
253Kaniasty K, Norris FM. Social Support in the Aftermath of Disasters, Catastrophes, and Acts of Terrorism: Altruistic, Overwhelmed, Uncertain, Antagonistic, and Patriotic Communities. Vol. 3. Bioterrorism: Psychological and Public health Interventions; 2004. p. 200-29.
254Singer M, Hodge GD. The War Machine and Global Health: A Critical Medical Anthropological Examination of the Human Costs of Armed Conflict and the International Violence industry. New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield; 2010.
255Robertson AG, Robertson LJ. From asps to allegations: Biological warfare in history. Military Med 1995;160:369-73.
256Christopher GW, Cieslak TJ, Pavlin JA, Eitzen EM Jr. Biological warfare. A historical perspective. JAMA 1997;278:412-7.
257Martin JW, Christopher GW, Eitzen EM. History of biological weapons: From poisoned darts to intentional epidemics. Med Aspects Biol Warfare 2007. p. 1-20.
258Leadbeater L, Inns RH, Rylands JM. Treatment of poisoning by Soman. Fundam Appl Toxicol 1985;5:S225-31.
259Vale A, Marrs TC, Rice P. Chemical terrorism and nerve agents. Medicine 2016;44:106-8.
260Watermeyer MJ, Dippenaar N, Simo NC, Buchanan S, Laher AE. Essential lessons in a potential Sarin attack disaster plan for a resource-constrained environment. Disaster Med Public Health Prep 2018;12:249-56.
261Fitzgerald GJ. Chemical warfare and medical response during World War I. Am J Public Health 2008;98:611-25.
262Wattana M, Bey T. Mustard gas or sulfur mustard: An old chemical agent as a new terrorist threat. Prehosp Disaster Med 2009;24:19-29.
263Ghabili K, Agutter PS, Ghanei M, Ansarin K, Shoja MM. Mustard gas toxicity: The acute and chronic pathological effects. J Appl Toxicol 2010;30:627-43.
264Lim SC, Yang JY, Jang AS, Park YU, Kim YC, Choi IS, et al. Acute lung injury after phosgene inhalation. Korean J Intern Med 1996;11:87-92.
265Tewari-Singh N, Inturi S, Jain AK, Agarwal C, Orlicky DJ, White CW, et al. Catalytic antioxidant AEOL 10150 treatment ameliorates sulfur mustard analog 2-chloroethyl ethyl sulfide-associated cutaneous toxic effects. Free Radic Biol Med 2014;72:285-95.
266Cevik Y, Onay M, Akmaz I, Sezigen S. Mass casualties from acute inhalation of chlorine gas. South Med J 2009;102:1209-13.
267Tomassoni AJ, French RN, Walter FG. Toxic industrial chemicals and chemical weapons: Exposure, identification, and management by syndrome. Emerg Med Clin North Am 2015;33:13-36.
268Chaboo CS, Biesele M, Hitchcock RK, Weeks A. Beetle and plant arrow poisons of the Ju,'hoan and Hai,,om San peoples of Namibia (Insecta, Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae; Plantae, Anacardiaceae, Apocynaceae, Burseraceae). Zookeys 2016;558:9-54.
269Venkatesh S, Memish ZA. Bioterrorism--A new challenge for public health. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2003;21:200-6.
270Evans RG, Crutcher JM, Shadel B, Clements B, Bronze MS. Terrorism from a public health perspective. Am J Med Sci 2002;323:291-8.
271Jansen HJ, Breeveld FJ, Stijnis C, Grobusch MP. Biological warfare, bioterrorism, and biocrime. Clin Microbiol Infect 2014;20:488-96.
272Balali-Mood M, Moshiri M, Etemad L. Medical aspects of bio-terrorism. Toxicon 2013;69:131-42.
273Anderson PD, Bokor G. Bioterrorism: Pathogens as weapons. J Pharm Pract 2012;25:521-9.
274Christian MD. Biowarfare and bioterrorism. Critical Care Clin 2013;29:717-56.
275Anderson PD. Bioterrorism: Toxins as weapons. J Pharm Pract 2012;25:121-9.
276Schwenk M. Chemical warfare agents. Classes and targets. Toxicol Lett 2018;293:253-63.
277Worek F, Wille T, Koller M, Thiermann H. Toxicology of organophosphorus compounds in view of an increasing terrorist threat. Arch Toxicol 2016;90:2131-45.
278Rodgers GC Jr., Condurache CT. Antidotes and treatments for chemical warfare/terrorism agents: An evidence-based review. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2010;88:318-27.
279Ilchmann K, Revill J. Chemical and biological weapons in the 'new wars'. Sci Eng Ethics 2014;20:753-67.
280Nef J. Human Security and Mutual Vulnerability: The Global Political Economy of Development and Underdevelopment; 1999.
281Cordesman AH. Terrorism, Ssymmetric Warfare, and Weapons of Mass Destruction: Defending the US Homeland. Greenwood Publishing Group; 2002.
282Khan AS, Levitt AM, Sage MJ. Biological and Chemical Terrorism; Strategic Plan for Preparedness and Response: Recommendations of the CDC Strategic Planning Workgroup; 2000.
283Papadimos TJ, Marcolini EG, Hadian M, Hardart GE, Ward N, Levy MM, et al. Ethics of outbreaks position statement. Part 2: Family-centered care. Crit Care Med 2018;46:1856-60.